“…The specific version of the multiple-systems view that was tested in the present experiments, the UnexpectedEvent Hypothesis (Frensch et al, 2002), receives theoretical support from similar ideas that have recently emerged in other areas of psychology, such as cognitive neuroscience (e.g., Botvinick, Braver, Barch, Carter, & Cohen, 2001;Cohen, Dunbar, & McClelland, 1990;Fernandez-Duque, Baird, & Posner, 2000;Fletcher et al, 2001;Norman & Shallice, 1986;Posner & Dehaene, 1994), emotion (Mandler, 1984(Mandler, , 2002Reisenzein, 2000;Scherer, 2001), metacognitive control (see, e.g., Koriat, 2000;Rosenthal, 2000aRosenthal, , 2000b, and memory (Whittlesea, 1997(Whittlesea, , 2002a(Whittlesea, , 2002bWhittlesea & Leboe, 2001;Whittlesea & Williams, 2000, 2001a, 2001b. The proposals discussed in these areas all point to the same conclusions, namely that human performance is permanently monitored or evaluated, and that during the detection of a processing mismatch (e.g., an unexpected event, a conflict, a failure of coherence, etc.)…”