2018
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consensus and clustering in opinion formation on networks

Abstract: Ideas that challenge the status quo either evaporate or dominate. The study of opinion dynamics in the socio-physics literature treats space as uniform and considers individuals in an isolated community, using ordinary differential equation (ODE) models. We extend these ODE models to include multiple communities and their interactions. These extended ODE models can be thought of as being ODEs on directed graphs. We study in detail these models to determine conditions under which there will be consensus and plu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each city is assumed to have internal opinion dynamics as described by the original system (1.1), and then there would be some coupling between the cities. This problem of interacting cities, each of which is composed only of congregators who follow the Marvel et al [7] model, was investigated in Bujalski et al [4]. One of the interesting findings in that paper is that increasing interaction strength between individual cities leads to a clustering phenomena.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each city is assumed to have internal opinion dynamics as described by the original system (1.1), and then there would be some coupling between the cities. This problem of interacting cities, each of which is composed only of congregators who follow the Marvel et al [7] model, was investigated in Bujalski et al [4]. One of the interesting findings in that paper is that increasing interaction strength between individual cities leads to a clustering phenomena.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…After that, we will assume there are zealots for opinion 1. As seen in the case of all congregators (see [4] and the references therein), it is known that there is a threshold such that if the proportion of zealots is above that threshold value, then the entire population will hold the same opinion as the zealots. We examine how the presence of contrarians effects this result, and to determine the manner in which they effect the size of the interval (X − , X + ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonlinear coupling term for the model Equation (7) takes into account the average proportion of speakers of language 𝑈 and language 𝑉 for all other groups, and is clearly very different from the linear coupling term associated with the model Equation (6). It is an open question as to whether this functional difference in the coupling terms leads to a qualitative difference in the dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MS model was extended to networks in Ref. 7, and this extended model was studied using dynamical systems techniques. Tanabe and Masuda 31 proposed and analyzed an interesting opinion formation model (hereafter labelled TM) in which it was assumed that the population itself breaks down into two groups: congregators and contrarians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the proportions of the total population that are in one of the mentioned states are tracked down. Bujalski et al [48] herein propose an extension of the system from [47]. In particular, conditions under which consensus and pluralism occur and the influence of zealots in the dynamics of forming an opinion are understood.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%