2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-018-4580-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consensus of fractional multi-agent systems by distributed event-triggered strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in Ye and Su (2018), based on the event-triggered mechanism, the problem of the leaderfollowing consensus of fractional multi-agent systems with input delay has been studied. Ren et al (2019) have considered the consensus of fractional-order multi-agent systems based on distributed event-triggered mechanism. It is worth noting that there are no results about the stability analysis and synthesis of FOSS via event-triggered mechanism, not to mention FTS analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in Ye and Su (2018), based on the event-triggered mechanism, the problem of the leaderfollowing consensus of fractional multi-agent systems with input delay has been studied. Ren et al (2019) have considered the consensus of fractional-order multi-agent systems based on distributed event-triggered mechanism. It is worth noting that there are no results about the stability analysis and synthesis of FOSS via event-triggered mechanism, not to mention FTS analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the question of how to achieve consensus for FOMASs has received much attention, and important developments involving leader-following group, cluster, finite-time, bipartite, group multiple lag and others have been presented. For example, nonlinear FOMASs with distributed input delays were considered in [12], a delay-dependent consensus condition for a class of linear FOMASs with distributed control containing input time-delay was proposed in [13], the event-triggered consensus for general linear FOMASs was investigated in [14,15] and the consensus of FOMASs without delay terms was studied in [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be mentioned that all works mentioned above focus only on the consensus regulation performance for FOMASs with the existence of time delays or/and nonlinearities [12][13][14][15][16][17][19][20][21][22]. However, energy consumption is an issue, and the so-called guaranteed cost control approach to tackle this problem, which considers the consensus regulation performance and the energy consumption at the same time, was proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since network control systems are affected by the limited bandwidth, packet losses and time-delay occur frequently in practical applications [1][2][3][4]. Considering the negative influence of these phenomena to system performance, event-triggered control (ETC) has been adopted widely as an effective method to save the communication resources [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Specially, different from the event-triggered mechanism in [5] requiring special hardwares to measure the states of system continuously, [6,7] put forward a periodic ETC strategy by combining ETC and traditional periodic sampling data control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specially, different from the event-triggered mechanism in [5] requiring special hardwares to measure the states of system continuously, [6,7] put forward a periodic ETC strategy by combining ETC and traditional periodic sampling data control. In [8], a self-triggered control (STC) scheme is presented instead of checking the triggering condition passively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%