2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2018.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consensus on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of Clostridium difficile infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…18 Because no single test has a high enough sensitivity and specificity to reliably distinguish between an asymptomatic carrier and symptomatic CDI, 2-step testing is typically preferred using 2 enzyme immunoassays highly sensitive for glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and highly specific for C difficile toxins (ie, antigen recognition). 18,77,[84][85][86][87][88][89] These assays are inexpensive and rapid, in general, and achieve a specificity and sensitivity of greater than 90%. 35,85,90 An alternative to GDH-based testing, nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT), targets chromosomal toxin genes and, in the past, these tests were expensive and time consuming; however, many facilities have adopted these as their primary testing modality.…”
Section: The Diagnosis Of CDI Should Include Laboratory Stoolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Because no single test has a high enough sensitivity and specificity to reliably distinguish between an asymptomatic carrier and symptomatic CDI, 2-step testing is typically preferred using 2 enzyme immunoassays highly sensitive for glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and highly specific for C difficile toxins (ie, antigen recognition). 18,77,[84][85][86][87][88][89] These assays are inexpensive and rapid, in general, and achieve a specificity and sensitivity of greater than 90%. 35,85,90 An alternative to GDH-based testing, nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT), targets chromosomal toxin genes and, in the past, these tests were expensive and time consuming; however, many facilities have adopted these as their primary testing modality.…”
Section: The Diagnosis Of CDI Should Include Laboratory Stoolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antimicrobial treatment failure, as indicated by clinical practice guidelines, persuaded the acting physicians to recommend FMT [20][21][22], whereas patients agreed on signing an informed consent. Fecal microbiota for transplant was prepared from screened, unrelated donors freely participating with the Microbiota Transplant Unit of University´s Faculty of Medicine, following 2017 European Consensus criteria and directions [21].…”
Section: Case Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GDH testing does not distinguish between toxigenic and nontoxigenic strains; therefore, a confirmatory test is needed for toxin analysis. The best test for detecting toxins is toxigenic culture (TC) due to its high Sn and Sp, but due to its turnaround times, other assays are preferred in the modern era [6][7][8]. The toxin A/B enzyme immunoassay (EIA) is a common confirmatory test that detects antibodies directed against both virulent clostridial toxins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%