2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2011.09646
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consensus with Preserved Privacy against Neighbor Collusion

Abstract: This paper proposes a privacy-preserving algorithm to solve the average consensus problem based on Shamir's secret sharing scheme, in which a network of agents reach an agreement on their states without exposing their individual state until an agreement is reached. Unlike other methods, the proposed algorithm renders the network resistant to the collusion of any given number of neighbors (even with all neighbors' colluding). Another virtue of this work is that such a method can protect the network consensus pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we say that an algorithm reaches average consensus with an exact privacy degree p, if in Problem 1 the function x ∞ = 1 N N i=1 x i (0). In our previous work [49], we address average consensus problem with a privacy degree instead of an exact privacy degree, i.e., there is no guarantee that the privacy x i (t) can be reconstructed from many enough messages {R i t (x i (t))} ∈I . 1 Here we insist that x∞ can be expressed as a non-trivial function of the initial states, i.e., x∞ = G(x 1 (0), .…”
Section: B Problem Of Privacy Preserving Consensusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, we say that an algorithm reaches average consensus with an exact privacy degree p, if in Problem 1 the function x ∞ = 1 N N i=1 x i (0). In our previous work [49], we address average consensus problem with a privacy degree instead of an exact privacy degree, i.e., there is no guarantee that the privacy x i (t) can be reconstructed from many enough messages {R i t (x i (t))} ∈I . 1 Here we insist that x∞ can be expressed as a non-trivial function of the initial states, i.e., x∞ = G(x 1 (0), .…”
Section: B Problem Of Privacy Preserving Consensusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been developed to achieve, at least to some extent, privacy-preserving consensus algorithms. Methods include masking the true state by adding deterministic offsets to the messages [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], adding random noise to the messages transmitted amongst nodes [50], [51], [52], [53], [46], and using various encryption schemes [54], [10], [55]. Another interesting method for computing separable functions without disclosing nodes' privacy appeared in [56], where agents exchange a set of samples drawn from a distribution depending on their true state, and the number of these samples can be tuned by a trade-off between the accuracy and privacy level of the algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%