2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.103.185702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequence of Excess Configurational Entropy on Fragility: The Case of a Polymer-Oligomer Blend

Abstract: By taking advantage of the molecular weight dependence of the glass transition of polymers and their ability to form perfectly miscible blends, we propose a way to modify the fragility of a system, from fragile to strong, keeping the same glass properties, i.e., vibrational density of states, mean-square displacement, and local structure. Both slow and fast dynamics are investigated by calorimetry and neutron scattering in an athermal polystyrene-oligomer blend, and compared to those of a pure 17-mer polystyre… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
32
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Table , bulk fragility values obtained via both DSC and ellipsometry agree well with each other, consistent with the observation for other polymer systems by Lan and Torkelson . For neat PS (high MW), we obtained m = 160 ± 15 by DSC and m = 161 ± 6 by ellipsometry (reported errors are standard deviations from three measurements), consistent with values reported previously. ,, …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…According to Table , bulk fragility values obtained via both DSC and ellipsometry agree well with each other, consistent with the observation for other polymer systems by Lan and Torkelson . For neat PS (high MW), we obtained m = 160 ± 15 by DSC and m = 161 ± 6 by ellipsometry (reported errors are standard deviations from three measurements), consistent with values reported previously. ,, …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We refer to values calculated by the Moynihan area matching method in the following text.) We note that we obtained m = 165 ± 12 by DSC for a high MW PS standard with M n = 107 kg/mol, consistent with other studies reporting fragility by DSC. ,,, We report an m value of 90 ± 6 for the PS/Anionic/3.6k sample, significantly lower than that for high MW PS. The value is within error, in reasonable agreement with those reported by Santangelo et al ( m = 97 for M w = 2.4 kg/mol by dynamic mechanical analysis) and by Sánchez et al ( m = 105 for M w = 4 kg/mol by DSC) for low MW PS standards.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, for example with their PSF, which shows a fragility change from m = 124 for the as‐received material to m = 286 for the wash‐precipitated material, the glass transition temperature itself changed by only 1 °C, which is not consistent with the amounts of plasticizer that need to be present in the polymer to create a more than doubling of the fragility. For example, Dalle‐Ferrer et al mixed a narrow PDI polystyrene of 92 kg/mole with a 0.735 kg/mole narrow PDI material in a ratio of 38% oligomer to 62% polymer. The fragility of the pure polymer was m = 180 while that of the mixture was m = 85.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%