2022
DOI: 10.1142/s0218271822500687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of a minimal length in a pseudo-complex extension of general relativity

Abstract: In this paper, the effects of a minimal length are investigated within an algebraically extended theory of General Relativity (GR). Former attempts, to include a minimal length in GR, are first resumed with a conformal factor of the metric as a consequence. Effective potentials for various black hole masses (as ratios to the minimal length) are deduced. It is found that the existence of a minimal length has, for a small mass black hole, important effects on the effective potential near the event horizon, creat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The action of the theory for the Schwarzschild limit is given by lefttrueS=σ2false(l,rfalse){12mr+B46r4truet˙21()1goodbreak−2mrgoodbreak+B46r4truer˙2r2trueθ˙2+sin2θtrueϕ˙2}italicdω,$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{ll}\kern-1em S& =\int {\sigma}^2\left(l,r\right)\Big\{\left(1-\frac{2m}{r}+\frac{B_4}{6{r}^4}\right){\dot{t}}^2\\ {}& \kern1em -\frac{1}{\left(1-\frac{2m}{r}+\frac{B_4}{6{r}^4}\right)}{\dot{r}}^2-{r}^2\left({\dot{\theta}}^2+{\sin}^2\theta \kern0.1em {\dot{\phi}}^2\right)\Big\} d\omega, \end{array}} $$ which leads to the equation (Maghlaoui & Hess 2022). lefttrue()italicdrdω2=12mr+B46r4×E2σ4false(rfalse)12mr+B46r4L2σ4false(rfalse)r21σ2false(rfalse)=E2...…”
Section: Pseudo‐complex Kerr Solution and The Minimal Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The action of the theory for the Schwarzschild limit is given by lefttrueS=σ2false(l,rfalse){12mr+B46r4truet˙21()1goodbreak−2mrgoodbreak+B46r4truer˙2r2trueθ˙2+sin2θtrueϕ˙2}italicdω,$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{ll}\kern-1em S& =\int {\sigma}^2\left(l,r\right)\Big\{\left(1-\frac{2m}{r}+\frac{B_4}{6{r}^4}\right){\dot{t}}^2\\ {}& \kern1em -\frac{1}{\left(1-\frac{2m}{r}+\frac{B_4}{6{r}^4}\right)}{\dot{r}}^2-{r}^2\left({\dot{\theta}}^2+{\sin}^2\theta \kern0.1em {\dot{\phi}}^2\right)\Big\} d\omega, \end{array}} $$ which leads to the equation (Maghlaoui & Hess 2022). lefttrue()italicdrdω2=12mr+B46r4×E2σ4false(rfalse)12mr+B46r4L2σ4false(rfalse)r21σ2false(rfalse)=E2...…”
Section: Pseudo‐complex Kerr Solution and The Minimal Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… σ2$$ {\sigma}^2 $$ as a function in the radial distance in the equatorial plane, for different values of α$$ \alpha $$, see Equation (30) of Maghlaoui and Hess (2022). α=8$$ \alpha =8 $$ is below the critical value (dashed line), α=818$$ \alpha =\frac{81}{8} $$ is at the critical value and α=12$$ \alpha =12 $$ is above the critical value.…”
Section: Pseudo‐complex Kerr Solution and The Minimal Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations