2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-016-2118-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of a warming climate for social organisation in sweat bees

Abstract: The progression from solitary living to caste-based sociality is commonly regarded as a major evolutionary transition. However, it has recently been shown that in some taxa, sociality may be plastic and dependent on local conditions. If sociality can be environmentally driven, the question arises as to how projected climate change will influence features of social organisation that were previously thought to be of macroevolutionary proportions. Depending on the time available in spring during which a foundress… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our simulations focused entirely on pollinator population variability induced through crop rotation. However, pollinators show large population fluctuations in response to weather patterns, which are expected to become less consistent under climate change (Kerr et al., 2015; Schürch et al., 2016). Maintaining complex boundary features, which include variation in aspect and vegetation structure and so provide a variety of stable microclimatic conditions, may help buffer populations against weather extremes and so potentially help to mitigate both weather‐induced variability and variability generated via spatially/temporally unpredictable crop flowering.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our simulations focused entirely on pollinator population variability induced through crop rotation. However, pollinators show large population fluctuations in response to weather patterns, which are expected to become less consistent under climate change (Kerr et al., 2015; Schürch et al., 2016). Maintaining complex boundary features, which include variation in aspect and vegetation structure and so provide a variety of stable microclimatic conditions, may help buffer populations against weather extremes and so potentially help to mitigate both weather‐induced variability and variability generated via spatially/temporally unpredictable crop flowering.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our transplant was limited to a single location, our results provide the first experimental support for the idea that primitive eusociality is absent from high altitude or latitude communities because the season is too short to rear consecutive broods (Soucy and Danforth 2002 ; Fucini et al 2009 ; Kocher et al 2014 ; Davison and Field 2016 ). Activity levels in small bees such as L. malachurum are positively correlated with ambient temperature (Bishop and Armbruster 1999 ; Schürch et al 2016 ), which at Cromarty lagged far behind the long-term average for the southeast UK. For example, temperatures at Cromarty as late as June and July did not exceed those recorded much earlier, in May, at Sussex (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most intraspecific variation in development time is apparently driven by temperature, such that development is prolonged at lower temperatures (Weissel et al 2006 ; Field et al 2012 ); moreover, sweat bees can exert only limited control over temperatures experienced by developing brood, such as by locating nests in exposed, south-facing ground (Potts and Wilmer 1997 ; Hirata and Higashi 2008 ). Thus, future climate warming is predicted to increase the northerly range of obligate eusocial sweat bees (Schürch et al 2016 ): indeed, within the last 25 years L. malachurum has rapidly expanded its range northwards within the UK and become much commoner (Falk 1991 , 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plasticity of individuals' time of development is regarded as an important response of euglossine bees to environmental fluctuation, with the production of several generations of short development in favorable contexts and delaying hatching, with increasing time as pupae, during unfavorable circumstances (Knoll, 2016). It is even possible to expect variation in the social organization itself, as sociality is dependent on local conditions and a single species may be either social or solitary (Schürch et al, 2016).…”
Section: Patterns Of Seasonalitymentioning
confidence: 99%