1983
DOI: 10.3171/jns.1983.59.5.0839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of dural defects acquired in infancy

Abstract: Four infants underwent craniectomy for craniosynostosis and subsequently developed an expanding cranial defect with herniation of brain. All four had an unrepaired laceration of the dura. The pathophysiology of this entity and of the growing fracture of childhood are discussed, and a unified interpretation of the consequences of unrepaired dural defects is proposed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, this entity has been reported under various names including growing skull fracture, enlarging skull fracture, expanding skull fracture, leptomeningeal cyst, posttraumatic bone absorption, posttraumatic porencephaly, traumatic ventricular cyst and cephalohydrocele [6, 11, 12, 13]. The most widely accepted concept postulates the coexistence of two factors: (1) disruption of the underlying dura and (2) an outward driving force that can be generated by cerebral edema or contusion, hydrocephalus or other intracranial fluid collections, a neoplasm or even a normally growing brain [14, 15]. The fact that the majority (90%) of the patients with growing skull fractures are children below the age of 3 years [1, 8]suggests that such a distraction force is more effective on the young skull bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, this entity has been reported under various names including growing skull fracture, enlarging skull fracture, expanding skull fracture, leptomeningeal cyst, posttraumatic bone absorption, posttraumatic porencephaly, traumatic ventricular cyst and cephalohydrocele [6, 11, 12, 13]. The most widely accepted concept postulates the coexistence of two factors: (1) disruption of the underlying dura and (2) an outward driving force that can be generated by cerebral edema or contusion, hydrocephalus or other intracranial fluid collections, a neoplasm or even a normally growing brain [14, 15]. The fact that the majority (90%) of the patients with growing skull fractures are children below the age of 3 years [1, 8]suggests that such a distraction force is more effective on the young skull bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GSFs, a complication of head injuries in children under 3 years of age, typically require a bony defect, an underlying durotomy and the dura to be under tension (as is the case with a rapidly developing brain) to occur [2,3,4,5,6]. Two of the three elements necessary for the development of GSFs, a cranial vault defect and a rapidly expanding process in the brain, are present in infants undergoing craniofacial surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rarely, and primarily in children under 3 years of age [2], so-called growing skull fractures (GSFs) or leptomeningeal cysts may develop. The factors thought to be necessary for this to occur are a cranial bone defect, an underlying dural tear and an expanding intracranial process such as rapid brain growth resulting from normal neurodevelopment [2,3,4,5,6]. In children with a GSF, there is progressive widening of the fracture, herniation of the leptomeninges and, ultimately, if left untreated, herniation of the underlying brain parenchyma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, approximately 1% of children with linear skull fractures can be expected to exhibit signs of leptomeningeal cyst formation. Typically, the diagnosis is initially suspected when a child who has suffered a closed head injury is recognized to have an expanding subgaleal collection several weeks or months after injury [9, 10]. Due to this delayed manifestation, terms such as ‘growing’ or ‘enlarging’ skull fracture have frequently been used to describe this entity [11, 12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%