2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of repeated ethanol exposure during early or late adolescence on conditioned taste aversions in rats

Abstract: Alcohol use is prevalent during adolescence, yet little is known about possible long-lasting consequences.. Recent evidence suggests that adolescents are less sensitive than adults to ethanol’s aversive effects, an insensitivity that may be retained into adulthood after repeated adolescent ethanol exposure. This study assessed whether intermittent ethanol exposure during early or late adolescence (early-AIE or late-AIE, respectively) would affect ethanol conditioned taste aversions 2 days (CTA1) and >3 weeks (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
4
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Enhanced sensitivity to these desired effects of EtOH could serve to promote EtOH consumption in adulthood. Similar retentions of adolescent-like responses to EtOH after adolescent EtOH exposure are also evident in terms of adolescent-typical insensitivities to sedative, motor impairing, and aversive effects of EtOH (White et al, 2002; Diaz-Granados & Graham, 2007; Matthews et al, 2008; Quiolin et al, 2012; Saalfield & Spear, 2015). To the extent that these measures serve in part as feedback cues to moderate intake, retention of adolescent-typical insensitivities to these cues could serve to increase capacity for the maintenance of elevated drinking in adulthood after adolescent EtOH exposure.…”
Section: Alcoholmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Enhanced sensitivity to these desired effects of EtOH could serve to promote EtOH consumption in adulthood. Similar retentions of adolescent-like responses to EtOH after adolescent EtOH exposure are also evident in terms of adolescent-typical insensitivities to sedative, motor impairing, and aversive effects of EtOH (White et al, 2002; Diaz-Granados & Graham, 2007; Matthews et al, 2008; Quiolin et al, 2012; Saalfield & Spear, 2015). To the extent that these measures serve in part as feedback cues to moderate intake, retention of adolescent-typical insensitivities to these cues could serve to increase capacity for the maintenance of elevated drinking in adulthood after adolescent EtOH exposure.…”
Section: Alcoholmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In Experiment 1, in contrast to much of the CTA literature (Anderson et al, 2010; Morales & Spear, 2013; Saalfield & Spear, 2015; Schramm-Sapyta et al, 2010), few notable age differences emerged, with animals at all ages exhibited relatively high baseline intake of the CS even though animals were not fluid restricted, likely due to the highly palatable and caloric nature of the CS, Boost® (see Table 1). It is possible that this high CS palatability could have influenced the ontogenetic patterns observed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Separating the animals in this way allowed for measurement of individual consumption without the stress of isolate housing, and has been used previously in our laboratory (e.g. Anderson, Varlinskaya and Spear, 2010; Saalfield and Spear, 2015). At the onset of training on conditioning day, each animal was provided with one bottle containing chocolate Boost®.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In naïve rats, alcohol is an aversive outcome that will drive aversive learning (Anderson, Varlinskaya, & Spear, 2010; Cunningham, 1981; Philpot, Badanich, & Kirstein, 2003; Saalfield & Spear, 2015). As a result, cues associated with alcohol will acquire aversive properties and will be avoided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%