2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of selection for growth on carcass and meat quality in Pirenaica cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
9
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Animals with a positive selection index had greater carcass traits than those from the other two groups, in accordance with the conclusions offered by Altarriba et al (2005). Weight at 210 d could therefore be an indicator of carcass quality.…”
Section: General Effects Of Selection Indexsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Animals with a positive selection index had greater carcass traits than those from the other two groups, in accordance with the conclusions offered by Altarriba et al (2005). Weight at 210 d could therefore be an indicator of carcass quality.…”
Section: General Effects Of Selection Indexsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Furthermore, the practical implications of having information about quality parameters related to bull sires has not been extensively studied in the international literature addressing carcass or meat quality (Maher et al, 2004;Altarriba et al, 2005). Intrabreed variability would be of major interest to breeders; to be competitive through an identifiable brand, they have to be able to offer the market a homogeneous product.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential genetic response was detected using an independent linear model for each studied trait (l): (2) where y ijl is the phenotype of the jth individual belonging to lot i (L), b a is the regression coefficient with age (A ijl ), b(y ijl ,û 210 ) is the slope of the covariance that relates individual phenotype for the morphological trait with breeding value for W 210 (û 210 ) and e ijl is the residual.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simple method described by Altarriba et al [2] was used since it does not require previous estimates of genetic correlation or specific experimental designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the best fit was obtained when they were considered as an "early development" genetic group (Figure 1). Two factors can be related to this: first, the model was based on the equations of the AFRC (1993) originated from studies that were carried out 50 years ago (ARC, 1980), when the genetic characteristics of the animals were very different from nowadays; second, the weight at weaning that has been used traditionally as main criteria for selection programs (PEREIRA et al, 2006;ALTARRIBA et al, 2005;PHOCAS & LALOË, 2004) could have resulted in the selection of early maturing animals. The relation between observed and simulated average liveweight per group is shown in figure 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%