2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation agriculture in irrigated intensive maize-based systems of north-western India: Effects on crop yields, water productivity and economic profitability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
58
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
11
58
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…All data recorded were analyzed with the help 55.8-59.6% higher stover yield compared to CT-MMS (Fig.1). Our findings of higher yields of maize under ZT and PB are in close agreement with the findings of Yadav et al, (2016a); Gathala et al, (2013); Parihar et al, (2016a); Parihar et al, (2017). The higher yields of maize in ZT/PB systems could be due to the compound effects of additional nutrients (BlancoCanqui and Lal 2009;Kaschuk et al, 2010) reduce competition for resources due to lesser weed population (Ozpinar, 2006) and improved bio-physicochemical soil health Parihar et al, 2016;Govaerts et al, 2009) over CT.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…All data recorded were analyzed with the help 55.8-59.6% higher stover yield compared to CT-MMS (Fig.1). Our findings of higher yields of maize under ZT and PB are in close agreement with the findings of Yadav et al, (2016a); Gathala et al, (2013); Parihar et al, (2016a); Parihar et al, (2017). The higher yields of maize in ZT/PB systems could be due to the compound effects of additional nutrients (BlancoCanqui and Lal 2009;Kaschuk et al, 2010) reduce competition for resources due to lesser weed population (Ozpinar, 2006) and improved bio-physicochemical soil health Parihar et al, 2016;Govaerts et al, 2009) over CT.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Our findings of higher MPYA under CA practices (ZT and PB) are in close agreement with the findings of Parihar et al, 2017. The higher availability of nutrients due to better soil bio-physico-chemical properties, better availability of soil moisture, and reduced competition for resources (Kaschuk et al, 2010;Parihar et al, 2016a) leads to higher uptake of the nutrient especially nitrogen which is critical for protein synthesis that ultimately resulted into higher protein profile of the crop under CA practices (ZT/PB) over CT. Moreover the better physical condition of soil under CA practices also leads to significant enhancement in the forage area of the plants by improving root length which in turn further leads to higher uptake of the nutrients as compared to CA practices (Passioura, 2002).…”
Section: Maize Protein Yield (Mpy)supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Additional biomass yield benefits over time from the legume (due to N-accumulation through biological N2 fixation and leaf litter) were also observed. Result of 4 years long study also revealed that the amount of water use (Evapo-transpiration) in CT was more than the CA (ZT and PB) practiced plots (Parihar, 2016). Conservation agriculture trail conducted for more than five year in Nepal on maize reveal more organic matter on conservation agriculture plot (12.87 t/ha) compared to traditional agriculture plot (10.93 t/ha) after 5 months growing period of maize (Karki and Shrestha, 2015).…”
Section: Role Of Conservation Agriculture On Carbon Sequestrationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Total amount of residue biomass inputs (t/ha) of preceding crop for succeeding crop grown in maize-wheat-mung bean (MWMb) system during four different years of experiment conducted in India was 27.05, 30.80 and 31.01 t/ha in conventional tillage (CT), zero tillage (ZT) and permanent bed planting (PBP) respectively (Parihar, 2016). The higher biomass yields in ZT is due to the compound effects of additional nutrients , due to lesser weed population, improved soil physical health, better water regimes and improved nutrient use efficiency over CT (Unger 1998).…”
Section: Role Of Conservation Agriculture On Carbon Sequestrationmentioning
confidence: 99%