2009
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2009.827.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation and Sustainable Use of Grapevine Genetic Resources in the Caucasus and Northern Black Sea Region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The identity of each genotype was defined based on the analysis of 25 SSR markers and comparison of genetic profiles with almost eight thousand fingerprints documented in the JKI-SSR-marker database, the European Vitis Database and genetic profiles generated during COST Action FA1003 and bibliography. Three volumes of Armenian ampelographies (published in 1947, 1962, and 1981), three volumes of Russian ampelographies (published in 1946–1956, 1963–1970, and 1984), Caucasus and Northern Black Sea Region Ampelography (published in 2012) and Ampelography by Melyan et al (published in 2019), represented the most important sources [ 19 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ]. Analysis of collected Armenian gemplasm revealed the following main cases: (i) synonyms (different cultivar names, but identical fingerprints), (ii) homonyms (identical or very similar cultivar names, but different fingerprints), (iii) unique genotypes, and (iv) questionable accessions (confirmed trueness to type based on ampelographic descriptors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The identity of each genotype was defined based on the analysis of 25 SSR markers and comparison of genetic profiles with almost eight thousand fingerprints documented in the JKI-SSR-marker database, the European Vitis Database and genetic profiles generated during COST Action FA1003 and bibliography. Three volumes of Armenian ampelographies (published in 1947, 1962, and 1981), three volumes of Russian ampelographies (published in 1946–1956, 1963–1970, and 1984), Caucasus and Northern Black Sea Region Ampelography (published in 2012) and Ampelography by Melyan et al (published in 2019), represented the most important sources [ 19 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ]. Analysis of collected Armenian gemplasm revealed the following main cases: (i) synonyms (different cultivar names, but identical fingerprints), (ii) homonyms (identical or very similar cultivar names, but different fingerprints), (iii) unique genotypes, and (iv) questionable accessions (confirmed trueness to type based on ampelographic descriptors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently two further ampelographies were added—Caucasus and Northern Black Sea Region Ampelography, published in 2012, providing descriptions of 34 local Armenian varieties and Ampelography, published in 2019 by G.G. Melyan, including 55 autochthonous varieties and 34 new bred cultivars [ 49 , 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since in our sample the cv. Assyl kara was recorded as one of the oldest traditional cultivar from North Caucasus [ 72 ], the introgression of a genetic contribution from Asian species into cultivated grapes may also significantly predate early 20th century breeding activities in Russia. It could well have occurred naturally through gene flow between different interfertile Vitis species followed by selection during domestication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the twentieth century many grapevine collections were established in the country (Maghradze 2008). Between 2003 and 2010, significant progress was made in the frame of international research projects on conservation and sustainable use of grapevine (V. vinifera L.) genetic resources in the Caucasus and Northern Black Sea region aiming at strengthening the capacity of the region (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova, Russia, and Ukraine) to ensure long-term maintenance of Vitis genetic resources, including the cultivated traditional varieties and the wild gene pool (Bacilieri 2008;Bacilieri et al 2010;Maghradze and Turok 2012). Beside conservation, the Georgian grapevine germplasm is involved in various scientific programs (Vouillamoz et al 2006;Imazio et al 2006;Maghradze et al 2009aMaghradze et al , 2010Schaal et al 2010;Myles et al 2011).…”
Section: Ampelographical Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%