“…For instance, the work of Elith et al (2006) has seen over 5,200 citations, but its conclusions are rarely questioned, even given known weaknesses in the evaluation metrics used (Golicher, Ford, Cayuela, & Newton, 2012;Lobo et al, 2008;Peterson, Papeş, & Eaton, 2007;Peterson et al, 2008). In this study, we have begun to address key issues that have been generally neglected in selecting ENMs for studies (but see Diniz-Filho et al, 2009;Buisson, Thuiller, Casajus, Lek, & Grenouillet, 2010;Terrible et al, 2012;de Oliveira, Araújo, Rangel, Alagador, & Diniz-Filho, 2012;de Oliveira, Rangel, Lima-Ribeiro, Terribile, & Diniz-Filho, 2014;de Oliveira et al, 2015;Collevatti et al, 2012Collevatti et al, , 2013. Model performance varied dramatically among ENMs and depending on the evaluation metric employed, making multimetric comparisons and careful consideration of the needs of each particular study a critical element in the analytical process and final model selection.…”