Conservation Criminology 2017
DOI: 10.1002/9781119376866.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation Crime Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, most efforts to understand and address IWT have focused on Africa and Asia, where megafauna such as elephants and tigers are declining due to demand from Asian markets (Sanderson et al, 2010;Wittemyer et al, 2014). Less attention has been given to the issue in Latin America, which represents less than 10% of peer-reviewed literature on illegal wildlife harvesting published between 1990-2014 (Kahler and Gore, 2017), leaving important gaps in our understanding of IWT in the region (Reuter et al, 2018a). Among these gaps is the recent trade in jaguars (Panthera onca) for domestic and international markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, most efforts to understand and address IWT have focused on Africa and Asia, where megafauna such as elephants and tigers are declining due to demand from Asian markets (Sanderson et al, 2010;Wittemyer et al, 2014). Less attention has been given to the issue in Latin America, which represents less than 10% of peer-reviewed literature on illegal wildlife harvesting published between 1990-2014 (Kahler and Gore, 2017), leaving important gaps in our understanding of IWT in the region (Reuter et al, 2018a). Among these gaps is the recent trade in jaguars (Panthera onca) for domestic and international markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concomitant with an increase in the funding and awareness of the myriad impacts of the IWT has been a substantial increase in research on wildlife crimes and their prevention within traditional conservation-based sciences (Kahler and Gore, 2017) and green or conservation criminology (McFann and Pires, 2020). Green criminology refers to the interdisciplinary study of environmental harm, including crime, victimization, law, regulation and justice (Lynch and Stretesky, 2011), which emerged over 30 years ago as a subfield of criminology in response to increasing environmental concerns and growth in green movements and politics (McFann and Pires, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As legal and illegal wildlife markets commingle and varied traditional uses of wildlife persist, evolve and converge across the planet, there are increasingly diverse actors participating, ranging from wildlife harvesters and intermediaries, who facilitate market transactions, to the final wildlife consumers (Phelps, Biggs & Webb, 2016). Unsurprisingly, there has been an exponential increase in research on wildlife crime among practitioners and scholars within the conservation and criminological sciences (Kahler & Gore, 2017; McFann & Pires, 2018). However, wildlife crime research has been largely qualitative or conceptual in orientation (McFann & Pires, 2018), biased toward the African context, focused predominantly on mammals and tends to be aimed at understanding ‘why’ (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, wildlife crime research has been largely qualitative or conceptual in orientation (McFann & Pires, 2018), biased toward the African context, focused predominantly on mammals and tends to be aimed at understanding ‘why’ (i.e. poacher perspective) rather than ‘how’ the crime takes place (Kahler & Gore, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation