2021
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.3510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation genetic assessment of the paleback darter, Etheostoma pallididorsum, a narrowly distributed endemic in the Ouachita Highlands, Arkansas, USA

Abstract: 1. The paleback darter, Etheostoma pallididorsum, is considered imperilled and has recently been petitioned for listing under the Endangered Species Act.Previous allozyme-based studies found evidence of a small effective population size, warranting conservation concern. The objective of this study was to

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although not directly comparable due to variations in loci used, our H o measures were much lower than the average H o for several Etheostoma at 0.735 (Sterling et al., 2012), as well as many other threatened and endangered darters such as Okaloosa Darter, Etheostoma okaloosa , at 0.599 (0.000–0.950; Austin et al., 2011), Watercress Darter, Etheostoma nuchale , at 0.671 (0.652–0.702; Fluker et al., 2010) and Roanoke Logperch, Percina rex , at 0.699 (0.448–0.837; Roberts et al., 2013). Average allelic richness ( A R ) among E. spilotum populations was also low at 3.96 (3.65–4.74) compared to other species of concern such as E. nuchale at 5.224 (4.41–6.28; Fluker et al., 2010) and E. pallidorsum at 4.16 (3.04–7.32; McCall & Fluker, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although not directly comparable due to variations in loci used, our H o measures were much lower than the average H o for several Etheostoma at 0.735 (Sterling et al., 2012), as well as many other threatened and endangered darters such as Okaloosa Darter, Etheostoma okaloosa , at 0.599 (0.000–0.950; Austin et al., 2011), Watercress Darter, Etheostoma nuchale , at 0.671 (0.652–0.702; Fluker et al., 2010) and Roanoke Logperch, Percina rex , at 0.699 (0.448–0.837; Roberts et al., 2013). Average allelic richness ( A R ) among E. spilotum populations was also low at 3.96 (3.65–4.74) compared to other species of concern such as E. nuchale at 5.224 (4.41–6.28; Fluker et al., 2010) and E. pallidorsum at 4.16 (3.04–7.32; McCall & Fluker, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This level of population differentiation is higher than that observed in several other threatened and endangered darter species with similar range sizes (although not directly comparable due to variations in loci used), such as the Trispot Darter, Etheostoma trisella and Paleback Darter, Etheostoma pallididorsum . In both of these species, only three putative populations were found ( K = 3), and populations recovered were separated by reservoirs with multiple panmictic tributaries making up some populations (Fast et al., 2023; McCall & Fluker, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Etheostoma species are not well represented in the fossil record (Bailey and Smith 1981); therefore, previous estimates of molecular divergence in darters that have used Centrarchid fossil records for calibration for divergence dating were used here (e.g., Near et al 2011, Bossu et al 2013, Fluker et al 2014). The substitution rate was estimated by Near et al (2011) from the mitochondrial cytochrome b (cytb) gene as 8.99x10 -3 , and this has been applied in recent estimates of molecular divergence in Etheostoma species (Echelle et al 2015, McCall and Fluker 2021, MacGuigan et al 2023. Although this rate may result in an underestimate of divergence time for ND2 as ND2 evolves at a faster rate than cytb (Mueller 2006), it is the best available rate for estimating divergence time from mitochondrial genes in Etheostoma species and was therefore used as the substitution rate in this analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%