2005
DOI: 10.1017/s0959270905000614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation implications of the drinking habits of Black-cheeked Lovebirds Agapornis nigrigenis in Zambia

Abstract: Since 1950, the annual rainfall in the habitat of Black-cheeked Lovebirds Agapornis nigrigenis has decreased, increasing dependence on artificial water supplies. In this study, the seasonal water requirements and drinking behaviour of the lovebirds in their natural habitat were investigated. During the dry season, lovebirds drank at the same water-point in the early morning and late afternoon. Flock sizes of birds at drinking sites ranged from 1 to 175 individuals. Birds from one locale all drank at the same w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lilian's lovebirds drank from diverse water sources. They drank in the early morning and late afternoon similar to the black‐cheeked lovebird in Zambia (Warburton & Perrin, ). However, the mean flock sizes at waterholes in LNP for the Lilian's lovebird during these peak times of the day differed to those for the black‐checked lovebird.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lilian's lovebirds drank from diverse water sources. They drank in the early morning and late afternoon similar to the black‐cheeked lovebird in Zambia (Warburton & Perrin, ). However, the mean flock sizes at waterholes in LNP for the Lilian's lovebird during these peak times of the day differed to those for the black‐checked lovebird.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They avoided waterholes when large mammals were present. Black-cheeked lovebirds also avoid waterholes with human or livestock disturbance (Warburton & Perrin, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation