2023
DOI: 10.1111/rec.13979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation in coastal soft‐sediment ecosystems: valuing places and recovery

Abstract: Coastal soft‐sediment environments provide numerous benefits to all aspects of life and are disproportionally impacted by anthropogenic influence. There is an acknowledgment that ecosystem restoration is required across the globe to combat environmental degradation over the past century. Initiatives like The United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration have an aim of protecting 30% of the world's oceans by 2030. While we need to set goals to prompt action, we also need to ensure that these goals are backed w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One crucial issue that impedes decisions on whether and how much to restore is the upfront cost of marine ecosystem restoration and ongoing monitoring costs (Bayraktarov et al 2016). Although the costs of coastal marine restoration are challenging to parameterize, pilot studies suggest that, while it is generally preferable to protect intact habitats rather than to restore degraded habitats, there are clear instances where active restoration is the most appropriate and cost-effective action (Society for Ecological Restoration International Science and Policy Working Group 2004, Saunders et al 2020, Evans andThrush 2023). The cost for marine coastal restoration projects is generally more expensive than restoring terrestrial habitats.…”
Section: Restorative Investmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One crucial issue that impedes decisions on whether and how much to restore is the upfront cost of marine ecosystem restoration and ongoing monitoring costs (Bayraktarov et al 2016). Although the costs of coastal marine restoration are challenging to parameterize, pilot studies suggest that, while it is generally preferable to protect intact habitats rather than to restore degraded habitats, there are clear instances where active restoration is the most appropriate and cost-effective action (Society for Ecological Restoration International Science and Policy Working Group 2004, Saunders et al 2020, Evans andThrush 2023). The cost for marine coastal restoration projects is generally more expensive than restoring terrestrial habitats.…”
Section: Restorative Investmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%