2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation of locomotion-induced oculomotor activity through evolution in mammals

Abstract: Highlights d Spino-extraocular motor coupling is evidenced from newborn mice ex vivo preparation d Adult decerebrated mice exhibit conjugated rhythmic eye movements during locomotion d Locomotor-induced oculomotor activity occurs in absence of visuo-vestibular inputs d Conserved CPG-based efference copy signal in vertebrates with common features

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significantly, this gaze-stabilizing mechanism that relies on locomotor EC signaling is not merely idiosyncratic to amphibians with their simpler and more stereotyped locomotor movement profiles, but evidently is also employed by other vertebrates, including humans. Recent studies in both Xenopus and mice (França de Barros et al, 2021;Bacqué-Cazenave et al, 2022) suggest that locomotor ECs can be used differently across species, depending on the biomechanical properties of their propulsive systems, their body organization, and the complexity of the sensory reference frames used to detect effective motion in space (Figure 6). This mechanism therefore represents an appealing example of a fundamental neural computation process that emerged early during vertebrate evolution and which was subsequently preserved, although necessarily superimposed by additional integrative mechanisms that accompanied the phylogenetic increase in sensory and motor system complexity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Significantly, this gaze-stabilizing mechanism that relies on locomotor EC signaling is not merely idiosyncratic to amphibians with their simpler and more stereotyped locomotor movement profiles, but evidently is also employed by other vertebrates, including humans. Recent studies in both Xenopus and mice (França de Barros et al, 2021;Bacqué-Cazenave et al, 2022) suggest that locomotor ECs can be used differently across species, depending on the biomechanical properties of their propulsive systems, their body organization, and the complexity of the sensory reference frames used to detect effective motion in space (Figure 6). This mechanism therefore represents an appealing example of a fundamental neural computation process that emerged early during vertebrate evolution and which was subsequently preserved, although necessarily superimposed by additional integrative mechanisms that accompanied the phylogenetic increase in sensory and motor system complexity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More direct evidence for locomotor EC-driven eye movements has recently been discovered in mice, where the existence of a comparable spino-ocular motor coupling has been established by multi-methodological approaches (França de Barros et al, 2021). Briefly, ocular motor activity remaining strictly phase-coupled to the rhythm of fictive locomotion was encountered in ex vivo brain-spinal cord preparations of neonatal mice with spatio-temporal characteristics reminiscent of those described in Xenopus.…”
Section: Evolution and Ubiquity Of Locomotor Efference Copy-driven Ga...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efference copies and corollary discharge signals have been shown to influence sensory processing in a variety of different systems and at different levels culminating in the predictive coding hypothesis (Combes et al, 2008; Crapse and Sommer, 2008; França de Barros et al, 2022; Fukutomi and Carlson, 2020; Poulet and Hedwig, 2006; Sommer and Wurtz, 2008; Wurtz, 2008). Despite decades of research, the mechanisms underlying the action of efference copies remain largely speculative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethologists and neuro-ethologists compare behaviors, MPs, and CPGs to understand the evolutionary mechanism(s) underlying one or several activities [ 55 ]. Functional morphologists compare “kinematics” (e.g., profiles and performances), and behavioral MPs to understand the links between “form” and “function” associated with one or more behaviors (e.g., functional trade-off) [ 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 ].…”
Section: Core Concept Of Neuroethological Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%