The article provides a way to quantify the role of information and knowledge in growth through structural adjustments. The more is known about environmental patterns, the more growth can be obtained by redistributing resources accordingly among the evolving sectors (e.g. bet-hedging). Formal equations show that the amount of information about the environmental pattern is directly linked to the growth potential. This can be quantified by treating both information and knowledge formally through metrics like Shannon's mutual information and algorithmic Kolmogorov complexity from information theory and computer science. These mathematical metrics emerge naturally from our evolutionary equations. As such, information becomes a quantifiable ingredient of growth. The policy mechanism to convert information and knowledge into growth is structural adjustment. The presented approach is applied to the empirical case of U.S. export to showcase how information converts into growth potential.Keywords: evolutionary growth, information, international trade, bet hedging, fitness decomposition, knowledge. JEL codes: B25; B52; C02; D80; D81; D92; F14; G11; O43. The Nobel-laureate and co-founder of the Santa Fe Institute, Murray Gell-Mann, came to the conclusion that although complex systems "differ widely in their … attributes, they resemble one another in the way they handle information. That common feature is perhaps the best starting point for exploring how they operate" (1995, p. 21). The article uses formal definitions of information and knowledge from information theory and computer science, links them to related definitions from evolutionary economics, and showcases the how information can inform structural change in the economy. Information theoretic metrics of information naturally emerge from evolutionary decompositions of growth and can directly be linked to the growth potential due to the redistribution of resources (i.e. structural change of the economic population).An intuitive micro-economic example will set the stage and introduce the presented argument. Imagine a bakery that produces salty and sweet goods. If nothing else is known about the future environment, economic evolution would suggest to let market selection winnow out the more profitable among these two business options (Nelson and Winter, 1985). However, if we have information about future dynamics, it might be profitable to intervene into market selection. Recent big data analysis of statistical patterns has revealed that the demand for sweet goods grows with rain and the demand for salty goods with sunshine. This information about the environment allows to adjust the structure of its product offerings to the identified environmental pattern. The more it knows about the relation, the more growth potential. Being aware of this relationship and the environmental pattern with regard to rain and sunshine, productivity increments of up to 20 % have been reported for individual bakeries (Christensen, 2012). The potential to grow depends on what is kno...