Conservation of pūpū whakarongotaua ­ the snail that listens for the war party

Abstract

Snail ecotypes are an indicator of local forms that can have cultural value and also represent evolutionary potential. Conservation of both regional diversity and evolutionary potential can be improved by recognition and documentation of genetically determined phenotypic variation. The large threatened terrestrial snail pūpū whakarongotau (Placostylus ambagiosus) is a range restricted species that is valued by the indigenous people of the northern most region of New Zealand, valued as both a security alarm and food source. Some populations of this rare species are restricted to sites of human occupation and oral history suggests these distinct populations represent prehistoric translocations. We used 2D geometric morphometrics and nuclear markers to document the distribution of variation. We aimed to determine whether shell shape variation was entirely an ecophenotypic plastic response, and whether or not prehistoric human movement of snails and establishment of food populations on pā sites (fortified settlements) had resulted in the loss of spatial genetic structure within this species. We could discriminate specimens due to shape variation among population samples without reference to their geographic origin. Using samples from prehistoric sites we infer shell shape in this species is not purely a plastic response to the local environment but reveals evolutionary history and potential. Genotypes with 1738 nuclear loci for 19 individuals from ten locations revealed some evidence of population mixing, but genetic variation was mostly partitioned among locations, with strong spatial structure revealed. Thus, we advocate conservation measures that will preserve local forms that represent evolutionary potential within this species.

Indigenous plant naming and experimentation reveal a plant–insect relationship in New Zealand forests

“…A two‐eyed seeing approach that values both experimental work and sources of IK also prepares a pathway for co‐management by valuing community knowledge and participation, and is thus more likely to succeed (Service et al, 2014; Zimmerman, Peres, Malcolm, & Turner, 2001). Given the high percentage of biodiversity with Indigenous stewards and lands, a partnership approach that values IK together with western scientific approaches is a powerful step forward (Daly, Trewick, Dowle, Crampton, & Morgan‐Richards, 2020; Moller, Berkes, Lyver, & Kislalioglu, 2004). Partnerships with Indigenous elders or other knowledge holders, whose understandings are grounded in specific localities, ecologies and geographies, are likely to offer unique insights about the demographies and ecologies of species and ecosystem function to improve conservation processes.…”

Centring Indigenous knowledge systems to re‐imagine conservation translocations

“…), kākahi (freshwater mussel Echyridella spp. ), pūpū whakarongotaua (kauri snail Placostylus ambagiosus ) and toheroa (clam Paphies ventricosa )—that have informed phylogeographic studies and increasingly, contemporary conservation translocations (Daly, Trewick, Dowle, Crampton, & Morgan‐Richards, 2020; McDowall, 2011; McEwan, Dobson‐Waitere, & Shima, 2020; Michel, Dobson‐Waitere, Hohaia, McEwan, & Shanahan, 2019; Ross et al., 2018).…”