2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10333-013-0387-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation of terraced paddy fields engaged with multiple stakeholders: the case of the Noto GIAHS site in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, some studies have shown that RFDC is able to increase cropland biodiversity [11] and control pests and disease, and then reduces the amount of chemicals used [8][9][10]31]. Ecological and cultural values of HHRTS are also capable of bringing some income to local farmers, for instance, via Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) and eco-tourism and cultural tourism [32,33]. Secondly, products from rice terraces such as red rice, fishes, loaches, duck eggs, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, some studies have shown that RFDC is able to increase cropland biodiversity [11] and control pests and disease, and then reduces the amount of chemicals used [8][9][10]31]. Ecological and cultural values of HHRTS are also capable of bringing some income to local farmers, for instance, via Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) and eco-tourism and cultural tourism [32,33]. Secondly, products from rice terraces such as red rice, fishes, loaches, duck eggs, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few authors have explored alternative states and their consequences for traditional rice terracing , Lansing et al 2014, Qiu et al 2014. Scenarios for the development of the system can be divided into two categories: (1) development with a varying degree of resilience without a regime shift and (2) development without resilience leading to a regime shift.…”
Section: Uncertainties In the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most common reasons is the absence of labor and a rural population where those terraces exist. Poverty as well as changes in the traditional values and lifestyle of rural communities (Posthumus and de Graaff, 2005) result in the majority of young residents leaving their own land and migrating to big cities where economic and work conditions are perceived superior (Lasanta et al, 2001;Tarolli et al, 2014), leaving behind old farmers (Garcia-Ruiz et al, 2013;Qiu et al, 2014). Meanwhile, slumps in agriculture prices and high maintenance costs reduce the economic returns of terracing (Antle et al, 2007;Qiu et al, 2014).…”
Section: Issues Of Terracing: Facing the Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poverty as well as changes in the traditional values and lifestyle of rural communities (Posthumus and de Graaff, 2005) result in the majority of young residents leaving their own land and migrating to big cities where economic and work conditions are perceived superior (Lasanta et al, 2001;Tarolli et al, 2014), leaving behind old farmers (Garcia-Ruiz et al, 2013;Qiu et al, 2014). Meanwhile, slumps in agriculture prices and high maintenance costs reduce the economic returns of terracing (Antle et al, 2007;Qiu et al, 2014). As terracing costs increased with increasing slope gradients (Table 4), terrace profitability decreased faster than once believed by farmers and stakeholders as indicated by a cost-benefit analysis from 11 cases in Peru (Posthumus and de Graaff, 2005;Bizoza and de Graaff, 2012).…”
Section: Issues Of Terracing: Facing the Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%