2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02244.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation of the microstructure of genome segments in Brassica napus and its diploid relatives

Abstract: SummaryThe cultivated Brassica species are the group of crops most closely related to Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis). They represent models for the application in crops of genomic information gained in Arabidopsis and provide an opportunity for the investigation of polyploid genome formation and evolution. The scientific literature contains contradictory evidence for the dynamics of the evolution of polyploid genomes. We aimed at overcoming the inherent complexity of Brassica genomes and clarify the effect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
164
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
12
164
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In principle, this difference could reflect chromosome rearrangements that accentuated the divergence between B. napus homoeologous chromosomes after the inception of this species. However, although a few genetic changes were detected in several B. napus cultivars (references cited in the introduction), accumulating evidence indicates that the B. napus A/C genomes remain essentially the same as the A/C genomes of their progenitors (Bohuon et al, 1996;Parkin and Lydiate, 1997;Rana et al, 2004;Suwabe et al, 2008;Cheung et al, 2009). This suggests that natural B. napus has evolved or inherited Pairinghomoeologous loci that ensure proper chromosome recombination and segregation (such as PrBn; Jenczewski et al, 2003;Liu et al, 2006;Nicolas et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, this difference could reflect chromosome rearrangements that accentuated the divergence between B. napus homoeologous chromosomes after the inception of this species. However, although a few genetic changes were detected in several B. napus cultivars (references cited in the introduction), accumulating evidence indicates that the B. napus A/C genomes remain essentially the same as the A/C genomes of their progenitors (Bohuon et al, 1996;Parkin and Lydiate, 1997;Rana et al, 2004;Suwabe et al, 2008;Cheung et al, 2009). This suggests that natural B. napus has evolved or inherited Pairinghomoeologous loci that ensure proper chromosome recombination and segregation (such as PrBn; Jenczewski et al, 2003;Liu et al, 2006;Nicolas et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two AtTPS1-like gene fragments (AJ856246 and DX046489) were also identified from Chinese cabbage, indicating the presence of at least one AtTPS1-like isoform in this species, in addition to the three shorter isoforms. On current evidence it appears that the duplication or transposition events that gave rise to the AtTPS2-3 and AtTPS4 genes may have occurred after the divergence of the Brassicaceae lineage from other flowering plants, but predated the divergence of the Arabidopsis and Brassica lineages, which is estimated to have occurred ∼20 million years ago (Rana et al 2004). However, this tentative conclusion may need to be revised as more sequence data become available from other families within the order Brassicales, which are at present less well represented in the NCBI GenBank sequence database than the Brassicaceae.…”
Section: The Short Class I Isoforms Of Tps May Be Unique To the Brassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B. napus (AACC; 2n ¼ 38) is an allopolyploid species formed by the hybridization of ancestors of Brassica rapa (AA; 2n ¼ 20) and Brassica oleracea (CC, 2n ¼ 18), while allopolyploid Brassica carinata (BBCC, 2n ¼ 34) is formed from Brassica nigra (BB, 2n ¼ 16) and B. oleracea, and allopolyploid Brassica juncea (AABB, 2n ¼ 36) is formed from B. rapa and B. nigra (U, Nagahara 1935). Judging from sequence variations within chromosome segments, domesticated B. napus has A-and C-genome components that have had few genetic changes relative to the presumed progenitor lines of B. rapa and B. oleracea (Rana et al 2004;Cheung et al 2009). Genetic mapping studies of B. napus cultivars have revealed only a few chromosomal rearrangements caused by recombination between homoeologous regions of the A and C genomes Sharpe et al 1995;Jenczewski et al 2003;Osborn et al 2003a;Udall et al 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%