2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2789765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation Policies: Who Responds to Price and Who Responds to Prescription?

Abstract: The efficiency properties of price and nonprice instruments for conservation in environmental policy are well understood. However, there is little evidence comparing the effectiveness of these instruments, especially when considering water resource management. We exploit a rich panel of residential water consumption data to examine heterogeneous responses to both price and nonprice conservation policies during times of drought while controlling for unobservable household characteristics. Our empirical models s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sometimes characterized as “market‐based approaches,” prices can be used to regulate water demand with increasing‐block tariffs, seasonal pricing, or rebates for efficiency (Bennear et al., 2013). Regulation, also called the prescriptive or “command‐and‐control” approach, principally consists of technology standards and restrictions on outdoor water use (Boyer et al., 2018; Olmstead & Stavins, 2009; Wichman et al., 2016). Public communication campaigns can also be used to influence water consumption behavior (e.g., Lamm et al., 2016).…”
Section: Water Conservation Restrictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sometimes characterized as “market‐based approaches,” prices can be used to regulate water demand with increasing‐block tariffs, seasonal pricing, or rebates for efficiency (Bennear et al., 2013). Regulation, also called the prescriptive or “command‐and‐control” approach, principally consists of technology standards and restrictions on outdoor water use (Boyer et al., 2018; Olmstead & Stavins, 2009; Wichman et al., 2016). Public communication campaigns can also be used to influence water consumption behavior (e.g., Lamm et al., 2016).…”
Section: Water Conservation Restrictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies call for greater attention to the effects of conservation regulations (Robinson & Conley, 2017; Wichman et al., 2016); a focus on the implementation process and the link between regulatory implementation and water consumption will allow a deeper understanding of their effects. To our knowledge, only one study has attempted to model the effects of enforcement actions on water use.…”
Section: Water Conservation Restrictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%