2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation value of dispersed tree cover threatened by pasture management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
54
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with our findings, others studies have documented, for example, how farmers' tree and forest management for shade coffee production drives afforestation and deforestation , and how farmers' management of trees in pastureland affects tree cover (Harvey et al 2011).…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…In line with our findings, others studies have documented, for example, how farmers' tree and forest management for shade coffee production drives afforestation and deforestation , and how farmers' management of trees in pastureland affects tree cover (Harvey et al 2011).…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…These genetic resources can provide breeders with the traits needed to adapt plants and animals to heterogeneous and changing environments (Fowler and Hodgkin 2004), and are an important buffer against the effects of climate change and desertification (Maestre et al 2012). However, land degradation and pressure on natural habitats threaten biodiversity in dry areas and farmer behaviour, if not directed otherwise, will generally result in decline in species diversity to meet immediate production objectives (Harvey et al 2011). …”
Section: Drylands: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While several studies have been conducted on farmer preferences of tree species (Garen et al 2011), as well as the presence of natural regeneration of trees and the alternate protection or cutting of certain species (Harvey 2000, Harvey et al 2011, few have compared these two forms of tree introduction in a landscape (Barrance et al 2003). In addition, the literature omits comparing these sources to project-promoted species in order to determine whether or not tree-planting efforts align with stakeholder preferences, or promote species that may have stakeholder value but are scarce or not naturally regenerating.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a study in Kenya demonstrated that average on farm tree density reached 702 trees per hectare in a formerly degraded landscape (Langkeek et al 2005), most studies focus on the occurrence of trees found in individual landscape elements, including windbreaks (Harvey 2000), riparian forests , and dispersed trees in pasture (Hervey and Haber 1999, Harvey et al 2011). The present study attempts to address the gap in the literature, taking a landscape approach to looking at the current state of tree cover in a heavily disturbed TDF landscape and how greater tree cover is apparently emerging from a combination of passive recovery of riparian forests, farmer decisions to plant more trees, including one plantation, and the more minor role played by projects that specifically promote tree planting.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation