Conservative treatment for urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion : a simple method

Abstract

Background The presence of urinary fistula after ileal conduit urinary diversion is a challenging complication , and this study investigated the role of the intra-conduit negative pressure system (NPS) in the presence of urinary fistula following ileal conduit (IC) urinary diversion as a conservative treatment. Methods Using the intra-conduit NPS, a minor drainage tube was placed within a silicon tube to suck urine from the conduit with consistent negative pressure. Patients with urinary fistula following IC from August 2012 to July 2017 were recorded, and the clinical characteristics and outcome were retrospectively analyzed. Results The intra-conduit NPS was used as a primarily conservative treatment for 13 patients who suffered from urinary fistula and presented with a large amount of abdominal/pelvic drainage without other significant morbidities. The median age was 60 years old (42-74 years), and 7 patients were male. The median duration between the IC operation and the presence of urinary fistula was 15 days (2-28 days), and elevated creatinine levels were detected in the abdominal/pelvic drainage with a median level of 2114 µmol/L (636-388 µmol/L). A significant decrease in abdominal/pelvic drainage was identified in 12 patients. The median time that the NPS was used was 9 days (7-11 days). The other patient did not show any improvements after 2 days of observation and then underwent open surgery. With ureteral stenting, 2 abdominal drainage tubes and the intra-conduit NPS were placed during operation, no urine leakage was observed in the abdominal/pelvic field, and the patient was cured in 9 days. With a median follow-up of 22 months, no fistula recurrence or hydronephrosis was detected. Conclusion The intra-conduit negative pressure system is a feasible and promising way to cure urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion. Because this procedure is a mini-invasive and simple approach, it might represent an alternative in selected patients.

A Report of 61 Cases of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephron-Sparing Surgery and Factors Affecting Postoperative Renal Function

“…Endoluminal cutting tools, such as bipolar electrocoagulation, ultrasonic scalpel, microwave scalpel, and radiofrequency ablation, have been widely used in RLNSS surgery, which can achieve a satisfactory hemostatic effect. Urinary fistula, as a common complication of RLNSS surgery, can be effectively improved by conservative treatment and urinary catheter and double J tube drainage [15]. If the patient has hematuria, it should be based on the patient's degree of hematuria, according to the doctor's advice to take reasonable treatment drugs.…”