We measured the activities of 50 operon fusions from a collection of mutant and wild-type rrnB P1 (rrnBlp in the nomenclature of B. J. Bachmann and K. B. Low [Microbiol. Rev. 44:1-56, 1980]) promoters under different nutritional conditions in order to analyze the DNA sequence determinants of growth rate-dependent regulation of rRNA transcription in Escherichia coli. Mutants which deviated from the wild-type -10 or -35 hexamers or from the wild-type 16-base-pair spacer length between the hexamers were unregulated, regardless of whether the mutations brought the promoters closer to the E. coli promoter consensus sequence and increased activity or whether the changes took the promoters further away from the consensus and reduced activity. These data suggest that rRNA promoters have evolved to maintain their regulatory abilities rather than to maximize promoter strength. Some double substitutions outside the consensus hexamers were almost completely unregulated, while single substitutions at several positions outside the -10 and -35 consensus hexamers exerted smaller but significant effects on regulation. These studies suggest roles for specific promoter sequences and/or structures in interactions with regulatory molecules and suggest experimental tests for models of rRNA regulation.Ribosome synthesis rates in Escherichia coli are a direct function of rRNA transcription rates under most growth conditions (26,34). In order to meet the cell's requirements for protein synthesis, cells transcribe rRNA and tRNA at approximately the square of the growth rate, a phenomenon termed growth rate-dependent regulation (29).The mechanism responsible for growth rate control remains unclear. Previously, it was shown that a negative feedback system is responsible for rRNA and tRNA regulation (15-17, 28, 39) and that the system responds to the level of ribosomes that are capable of translation (10, 49). The magnitude of the signal made in response to the cell's translational capacity varies with the nutritional state of the culture. The identity of the signal is not known, although guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) has been implicated as playing some role because of the virtually perfect inverse correlation between stable RNA synthesis and ppGpp concentration (36).The target of the signal, whatever its identity, has been shown in at least three of the seven rRNA operons to be P1, the more upstream of the two rRNA promoters (rrnB and rrnE [15]; rrnA [37] there is a region called the upstream activation sequence (UAS), which is required for maximal promoter activity (4,15,23).Mutations have been targeted to specific sites in the promoters rrnB P1 and tyrT, and activities resulting from the fusion of the mutant promoters to "reporter" genes have been measured under different growth conditions (15,46). Such experiments have implicated DNA sequences required for growth rate-dependent control in the region between -20 and -50 (15) and in the region just downstream of the -10 hexamer (46). The mutations examined in both studies contained ...