2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2014.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conserved function of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) homologues as signals for storage organ differentiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GA suppresses the production of the DELLA protein (including GAI ; REPRESSOR OF GA1-3 , RGA1-3 ; RGA-LIKE1-3 , RGL1-3 ), which is antagonistic to GA signaling [16,17]. In addition, members of other transcription factor families, namely MYB, MADS, AP2/ERF, bHLH, WRKY and TCP, are also involved in floral induction and flowering [18,19,20,21,22]. For example, FLOWERING LOCUS C ( FLC ) transcription is regulated by the MADS box transcription factor SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE ( SVP ), the product of which binds to the promoters of FT and SOC1 [3,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GA suppresses the production of the DELLA protein (including GAI ; REPRESSOR OF GA1-3 , RGA1-3 ; RGA-LIKE1-3 , RGL1-3 ), which is antagonistic to GA signaling [16,17]. In addition, members of other transcription factor families, namely MYB, MADS, AP2/ERF, bHLH, WRKY and TCP, are also involved in floral induction and flowering [18,19,20,21,22]. For example, FLOWERING LOCUS C ( FLC ) transcription is regulated by the MADS box transcription factor SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE ( SVP ), the product of which binds to the promoters of FT and SOC1 [3,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the dgt mutation delays the number of days to flowering in either SP or sp backgrounds (Balbi and Lomax, 2003), apparently by reducing the expression of SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS ( SFT ) gene, which encodes the florigen (Evans, 1971; Shalit et al, 2009). It does not, however, significantly affect the number of leaves produced before termination, which is a proven effect of SFT and its orthologs in tomato and other species (Kojima et al, 2002; Lifschitz and Eshed, 2006; Navarro et al, 2015). Hence, the loss-of-function sft mutant produced 130% more leaves on the primary shoot than the control MT (Vicente e al., 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Photoperiodic control on potato tuberization based on a coincidence model of light and StCOL1 expression (adapted from Navarro et al ). In long days, circadian clock proteins interact with a repressor of StCOL1 expression called StCDF1, which leads to its degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simplified model explaining the molecular control behind potato tuberization and the proposed coincidence model is described in Fig. 1 Navarro et al 2015). In long days, circadian clock proteins interact with a repressor of StCOL1 expression called StCDF1, which leads to its degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%