2015
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddv299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conserved hippocampal cellular pathophysiology but distinct behavioural deficits in a new rat model of FXS

Abstract: Recent advances in techniques for manipulating genomes have allowed the generation of transgenic animals other than mice. These new models enable cross-mammalian comparison of neurological disease from core cellular pathophysiology to circuit and behavioural endophenotypes. Moreover they will enable us to directly test whether common cellular dysfunction or behavioural outcomes of a genetic mutation are more conserved across species. Using a new rat model of Fragile X Syndrome, we report that Fmr1 knockout (KO… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
105
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
12
105
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Naturally, research has focused on the molecular and biochemical changes that result from loss of FMRP and potential compensatory and therapeutic targets (Tamanini et al, 1996; Hagerman et al, 2010; Sharma et al, 2010; Bhattacharya et al, 2012). This is partly because of the impressive progress in understanding FXS, which began by identifying the cause (Pieretti et al, 1991), a CGG trinucleotide repeat expansion exceeding 200 repeats, leading to loss of FMRP and then modeling it by deletion of Fmr1 in mice (Bakker et al, 1994) and recently rats (Till et al, 2015). In vitro physiological investigation was then successful in characterizing and delineating synaptic dysfunctions that are associated with Fmr1 KO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Naturally, research has focused on the molecular and biochemical changes that result from loss of FMRP and potential compensatory and therapeutic targets (Tamanini et al, 1996; Hagerman et al, 2010; Sharma et al, 2010; Bhattacharya et al, 2012). This is partly because of the impressive progress in understanding FXS, which began by identifying the cause (Pieretti et al, 1991), a CGG trinucleotide repeat expansion exceeding 200 repeats, leading to loss of FMRP and then modeling it by deletion of Fmr1 in mice (Bakker et al, 1994) and recently rats (Till et al, 2015). In vitro physiological investigation was then successful in characterizing and delineating synaptic dysfunctions that are associated with Fmr1 KO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive discrimination deficits are prominent in Fmr1 knockout (KO) rodents that do not make FMRP, although learning and memory per se are relatively normal (Bakker et al, 1994; D’Hooge et al, 1997; Zhao et al, 2005; Brennan et al, 2006; Bhattacharya et al, 2012; Till et al, 2015). Indeed, loss of FMRP did not alter activity-dependent synaptic plasticity in cultured neurons (Segal et al, 2003) but is associated with enhanced mGluR-stimulated hippocampal long-term depression (LTD) (Huber et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We defined exploration as sniffing or touching the stimuli objects with the muzzle and/or forepaws. A discrimination index (DI = (Time exploring novel object À Time exploring familiar object)/Total object exploration time) was used as a measure of discrimination between familiar and novel objects (Aggleton, Albasser, Aggleton, Poirier, & Pearce, 2010;Aubele, Kaufman, Montalmant, & Kritzer, 2008;Langston & Wood, 2010;Cohen et al, 2008;Till et al, 2015). DI varies between À1 and +1.…”
Section: Behavioral Procedures and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homozygous deletion of FMR1 ( FMR1-KO ) in rodents produces a dendritic spine abnormality that resembles the phenotype seen in FXS patients (6, 7). Furthermore, FMR1-KO mice and rats exhibit cognitive and behavioral traits, some of which are consistent with those of the FXS patients, such as hyperactivity as well as learning and memory defects (8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%