2013
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conserving large populations of lions – the argument for fences has holes

Abstract: Packer et al. reported that fenced lion populations attain densities closer to carrying capacity than unfenced populations. However, fenced populations are often maintained above carrying capacity, and most are small. Many more lions are conserved per dollar invested in unfenced ecosystems, which avoid the ecological and economic costs of fencing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considered a classic ''market failure'' (Nelson, 2009;Nelson et al, 2010), global high value species such as the tiger Panthera tigris impose diverse and pervasive costs on local communities in poor countries and regions that include loss of human life and livestock and associated opportunity costs (Barua et al, 2013;Dickman et al, 2011;Inskip and Zimmermann, 2009;Macdonald et al, 2010). With a rapidly increasing human population and intense competition for resources, conservationists and policy makers are divided about the best approach to conserve these species (Creel et al, 2013;Dickman et al, 2011;Packer et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considered a classic ''market failure'' (Nelson, 2009;Nelson et al, 2010), global high value species such as the tiger Panthera tigris impose diverse and pervasive costs on local communities in poor countries and regions that include loss of human life and livestock and associated opportunity costs (Barua et al, 2013;Dickman et al, 2011;Inskip and Zimmermann, 2009;Macdonald et al, 2010). With a rapidly increasing human population and intense competition for resources, conservationists and policy makers are divided about the best approach to conserve these species (Creel et al, 2013;Dickman et al, 2011;Packer et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, not weighting for population size strongly biases regional population projections. By treating all populations, small and large, equally, Finally, claims of the efficacy of fencing for lion conservation are misplaced (10). For example, contrary to statements ( figure 4 in ref. 3), Kgalagadi is partially fenced, whereas the eastern side of Kruger National Park has not been fenced since 2002.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, contrary to statements ( figure 4 in ref. 3), Kgalagadi is partially fenced, whereas the eastern side of Kruger National Park has not been fenced since 2002. Moreover, small fenced reserves make questionable contributions to lion conservation (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debate regarding the conservation value of small, fenced, privately owned, and intensively managed areas for large predator conservation continues (Creel et al 2013, Packer et al 2013. For conservation authorities to develop effective solutions that facilitate sustainable predator management on private land, they must consider the strong and not necessarily beneficial multiscale socioeconomic factors, such as international tourist preferences and regional policy recommendations, which influence private land management.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%