2003
DOI: 10.1080/713672718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conserving One Water Source at the Expense of Another: The Role of Surface Water Price in Adoption of Wells in a Conjunctive Use System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the price of surface water increases, farmers tend to pump more groundwater. Schuck and Green (2003a) find that when the price of surface water reaches 62% of the marginal cost of pumping groundwater, the likelihood of a farmer having a well reaches 50%. Surface water prices in Arvin-Edison ranged from USD41 to USD71 per 1,000 m 3 in 1997, while the estimated cost of pumping groundwater ranged from USD51 to USD91 per 1,000 m 3 (Schuck and Green, 2003a).…”
Section: Water Markets and Conjunctive Usementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As the price of surface water increases, farmers tend to pump more groundwater. Schuck and Green (2003a) find that when the price of surface water reaches 62% of the marginal cost of pumping groundwater, the likelihood of a farmer having a well reaches 50%. Surface water prices in Arvin-Edison ranged from USD41 to USD71 per 1,000 m 3 in 1997, while the estimated cost of pumping groundwater ranged from USD51 to USD91 per 1,000 m 3 (Schuck and Green, 2003a).…”
Section: Water Markets and Conjunctive Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schuck and Green (2003a) find that when the price of surface water reaches 62% of the marginal cost of pumping groundwater, the likelihood of a farmer having a well reaches 50%. Surface water prices in Arvin-Edison ranged from USD41 to USD71 per 1,000 m 3 in 1997, while the estimated cost of pumping groundwater ranged from USD51 to USD91 per 1,000 m 3 (Schuck and Green, 2003a). These prices are notably higher than those observed in some other districts in California with more senior water rights or exchange contracts with the Bureau of Reclamation.…”
Section: Water Markets and Conjunctive Usementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those argue that increasing water price may not only lead to a reduction in agricultural production, but may additionally increase rural poverty (Tardieu and Prefol 2002;Liao et al 2007). Other case studies showed that increasing water pricing may cause over-utilization of groundwater resources (Schuck and Green 2003;Liao et al 2008). Thus, the design and implementation of the water pricing process need to be conducted with great care, taking into account economic consequences and other external effects (Liao et al 2007;Schuck and Green 2003;Tardieu and Prefol 2002;Tsur 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other case studies showed that increasing water pricing may cause over-utilization of groundwater resources (Schuck and Green 2003;Liao et al 2008). Thus, the design and implementation of the water pricing process need to be conducted with great care, taking into account economic consequences and other external effects (Liao et al 2007;Schuck and Green 2003;Tardieu and Prefol 2002;Tsur 2005). All requirements regarding legal and regulatory framework, operational criteria, and economic criteria need to be addressed to realize an effective water pricing system (Perry 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%