2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consideration of future consequences scale: Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individuals who attach a high degree of importance to the immediate consequences of behavior are low in CFC, while individuals who attach a high degree of importance to the future consequences of behavior are high in CFC (Joireman et al 2008). It is believed that those with higher CFC would adopt practices that are more sustainable (Hevey et al 2010) whereby adoption of Green IT would lead to a more sustainable environment ). Commuting to work using public transportation is an example of sustainability practices and it was found that individuals high in CFC prefer commuting by public transportation and are especially sensitive to the perceived environmental impact of cars.…”
Section: Consideration Of Future Consequences (Cfc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Individuals who attach a high degree of importance to the immediate consequences of behavior are low in CFC, while individuals who attach a high degree of importance to the future consequences of behavior are high in CFC (Joireman et al 2008). It is believed that those with higher CFC would adopt practices that are more sustainable (Hevey et al 2010) whereby adoption of Green IT would lead to a more sustainable environment ). Commuting to work using public transportation is an example of sustainability practices and it was found that individuals high in CFC prefer commuting by public transportation and are especially sensitive to the perceived environmental impact of cars.…”
Section: Consideration Of Future Consequences (Cfc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the items in the questionnaire were adapted from relevant previous research (Chen et al 2011;Dao et al 2011;Hevey et al 2010;Molla and Abareshi 2012). All question items were measured using a five-point Likert-type scale with anchors ranging from ''Strongly disagree'' to ''Strongly agree''.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best model fit produced a comparative fit index (CFI) of 0.90, a normed fit index (NFI) of 0.85, and a root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) of 0.08. Existing guidelines show that a CFI of 0.90 to 0.95 is an acceptable model fit (Hu & Bentler, 1999), a NFI approaching 1.0 is a good model fit (Hevey et al, 2010), while a RMSEA below 0.08 is acceptable (Browne & Cudeck, 1993).…”
Section: Confirmatory Factor Analysis (Cfa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CFC scale is one of the most commonly used measures of time perspective in psychological research (Hevey et al, 2010;Petrocelli, 2003). The scale has a high level of internal consistency and reliability (Finke, 2005;Hevey et al, 2010;Strathman et al, 1994).…”
Section: Bounded Willpower Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%