2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11047-013-9369-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consideration of mobile DNA: new forms of artificial genetic regulatory networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of the underlying dynamic connection behavior is as reported above. Fitness drops significantly for higher B, as seen in the RBNK model with and without the structural dynamism previously used [2], and also in the RBNKCS model of multicellularity with and without that form of structural dynamism [3,4].…”
Section: Multicellularitymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Analysis of the underlying dynamic connection behavior is as reported above. Fitness drops significantly for higher B, as seen in the RBNK model with and without the structural dynamism previously used [2], and also in the RBNKCS model of multicellularity with and without that form of structural dynamism [3,4].…”
Section: Multicellularitymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Further consideration of epigenetic control suggests a number of extensions to this work in the near future, particularly in conjunction with the use of mobile DNA inspired mechanisms (e.g., see [Bull, 2013]). Future work should also consider the use of epigenetic control within other GRN representations, explore whether these results also hold for asynchronous GRN updating schemes, and determine whether the general results also appear to be true for much larger multicellular systems, i.e., for S>>1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was effective at certain tasks, which benefited from decomposition; however, the complexity and appropriate parameterization of the system was a significant issue. Self-modification was also explored in [31] within the context of a model of mobile DNA applied to Boolean networks, in which the author found it to be beneficial in terms of access and stability of attractors. We have also explored a simpler model of chromatin remodeling in which subtasks are prespecified [8], and published initial results using the current approach [9] which have been significantly extended in this paper.…”
Section: Self-modification In Artificial Biochemical Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%