Despite recent declines in cardiovascular mortality in women over the past decade, cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the number 1 killer of women.1 Deaths attributable to CVD outnumber the deaths attributable to breast, ovarian, uterine, cervical, or vaginal cancers, or childbirth combined, and yet, when the medical community refers to women's health, they continue to focus on the bikini boundaries.
SEX DIFFERENCES IN TREATMENT FOR CVDWomen continue to be labeled as a special population in many guidelines relating to CVD, despite being the majority of the population. Nonetheless, when presenting with an acute coronary syndrome, it is women, in particular, younger women, who are less likely to receive guideline-recommended therapies, timeliness of care, or diagnostic and invasive therapies resulting in worse outcomes in comparison with men.2 Women who experience cardiac arrest are less likely to receive bystander CPR than men, and less likely to receive guideline-recommended therapies. The prevalence of heart failure is greater in women than in men, and, despite the sex differences in the causes and types of heart failure, women with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction are less likely to receive evidence-based therapies, including medications, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, ventricular assist devices, and heart transplant, despite improved survival and quality of life when receiving these therapies. Asymptomatic peripheral artery disease is twice as common in women as in men, and once a diagnosis of peripheral artery disease is made, women have greater functional impairment, lower rates of revascularization, and an increased likelihood of emergent procedures. This persistent pattern of poorer cardiovascular outcomes appears predominantly attributable to suboptimal use of guideline-recommended therapy in women, despite the strong evidence that management of CVD with evidence-based therapies benefits both sexes equally.
SEX-SPECIFIC CVD RISK FACTORSThere are unique CVD risk factors for women related to pregnancy or hormonal influences. The effect of adverse pregnancy outcomes is emerging as an important predictor of future CVD risk. Pregnancies associated with preterm delivery, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and eclampsia increase the risk of future CVD. Pregnancy appears to be a natural stress test identifying at-risk women, but because these conditions disappear postpartum, the increased CVD risk is often not translated to women. These adverse pregnancy outcomes are also not assessed when using current CVD risk assessment tools. Other unique risk factors for women include polycystic ovarian syndrome), functional hypothalamic amenorrhea, menopausal status and hormone use, also not assessed in contem-