2009
DOI: 10.2174/1874434600903010065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consideration of Shared Decision Making in Nursing: A Review of Clinicians’ Perceptions and Interventions

Abstract: As the number of individuals with chronic illness increases so has the need for strategies to enable nurses to engage them effectively in daily management of their conditions. Shared decision making between patients and nurses is one approach frequently discussed in the literature. This paper reviews recent studies of shared decision making and the meaning of findings for the nurse-patient relationship. Patients likely to prefer to engage in shared decision making are younger and have higher levels of educatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
49
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…27,28 In addition to these professional and process benefits, involving patients in the monitoring of their condition using PROMs might generate other significant benefits. In the drive to put the patients at the center of their care and emerging priorities such as secondary prevention and self-management of chronic conditions, additional benefits of PROMs collection include increased selfmanagement of chronic conditions, 24 patient empowerment and shared decision making, 29,30 increased compliance to treatment goals, 31 and early detection of deterioration or adverse changes. 32 The potential of Web-based and mobile technologies for collecting health data augurs fundamental changes in the way clinicians interact with patients and holds promise for addressing problems associated with clinical data collection in busy clinical environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 In addition to these professional and process benefits, involving patients in the monitoring of their condition using PROMs might generate other significant benefits. In the drive to put the patients at the center of their care and emerging priorities such as secondary prevention and self-management of chronic conditions, additional benefits of PROMs collection include increased selfmanagement of chronic conditions, 24 patient empowerment and shared decision making, 29,30 increased compliance to treatment goals, 31 and early detection of deterioration or adverse changes. 32 The potential of Web-based and mobile technologies for collecting health data augurs fundamental changes in the way clinicians interact with patients and holds promise for addressing problems associated with clinical data collection in busy clinical environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An anticipated complexity of the literature search was the multiple terms used independently and interchangeably for SDM. The heterogeneity of the concepts, definitions and terms used in relation to SDM has been described by other authors [22]. Makoul and Clayman [23], found in a review of 418 papers devoted to SDM that the terms "patient preference" and "options" were terms used in more than half.…”
Section: Search Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also tension, and ethical dilemma's for clinicians when patients choose a path that is clearly not in their best interests based on the available evidence. 62 One of the benefits of utilising EBP is to eliminate unwarranted variations in care. While variations in care may be a result of patient preference, 63 paradoxically, SDM appears to reduce variations in care.…”
Section: Evidence Based Practicementioning
confidence: 99%