Considerations for a Human Rights Impact Assessment of a Population Wide Treatment for HIV Prevention Intervention

Abstract

Increasing attention is being paid to the potential of anti-retroviral treatment (ART) for HIV prevention. The possibility of eliminating HIV from a population through a universal test and treat intervention, where all people within a population are tested for HIV and all positive people immediately initiated on ART, as part of a wider prevention intervention, was first proposed in 2009. Several clinical trials testing this idea are now in inception phase. An intervention which relies on universally testing the entire population for HIV will pose challenges to human rights, including obtaining genuine consent to testing and treatment. It also requires a context in which people can live free from fear of stigma, discrimination and violence, and can access services they require. These challenges are distinct from the field of medical ethics which has traditionally governed clinical trials and focuses primarily on patient researcher relationship. This paper sets out the potential impact of a population wide treatment as prevention intervention on human rights. It identifies five human right principles of particular relevance: participation, accountability, the right to health, non-discrimination and equality, and consent and confidentiality. The paper proposes that explicit attention to human rights can strengthen a treatment as prevention intervention, contribute to mediating likely health systems challenges and offer insights on how to reach all sections of the population.

Good Health and Moral Responsibility: Key Concepts Underlying the Interpretation of Treatment as Prevention in South Africa and Zambia Before Rolling Out Universal HIV Testing and Treatment

“…Neither on the global stage nor in all 21 study communities was there much current evidence of substantial stigma reduction efforts. Yet, as Nguyen et al comment, “it is time to move forward, not backward, 3 and to actively reduce stigma and discrimination for TasP to be safely implemented.” 41 The 2016 IAS Conference reiterated this point, reviving a stigma and discrimination focus as critical to future endeavors. Given the danger of responsibility sitting too heavily on the shoulders of PLHIV, TasP programs could adopt an approach that advocates coupling the good news that early treatment protects health alongside broader motivations that build on the understanding of PMTCT and shared social action to prevent HIV.…”

Knowledge, Attitude, and the Real Practice of General Dental Practitioners in Shiraz, Iran Towards Accepting HIV-Positive Patients

“…Dental professionals' hesitance to accept HIV+ patients can result in much worse consequences, for example, they will not disclose their HIV status in future visits to other dentists. This is called driving HIV underground (19,20). Findings from such studies should be implemented in oral health systems to increase the services available to HIV+ patients and to decrease the chance of cross-transmission of HIV in dental/health sector settings (21).…”