2018
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciy774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considerations for Clinical Trials of Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection in Adults

Abstract: Clinical trials for Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (SAB) are broadly grouped into two categories: registrational trials intended to support regulatory approval of antibiotics for the treatment of SAB, and strategy trials intended to inform clinicians on the best treatment options for SAB among existing antibiotics. Both types of SAB trials are urgently needed but have been limited by cost, complexity, and regulatory uncertainty. This manuscript reviews key SAB trial design considerations for inve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mortality and complications such as persistent bacteremia and infection relapse have been observed in >30% of cases despite appropriate antibiotic therapy, and patients with complicated tissue foci of infections are more likely to have poor outcomes [1, 2]. Risk stratification biomarkers offer a potential adjunctive tool for the identification of patients with S. aureus bacteremia at higher risk for poor outcomes, which could not only inform best management practices, but also facilitate clinical development of new drugs by identifying the patients who would most benefit from novel therapeutics [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mortality and complications such as persistent bacteremia and infection relapse have been observed in >30% of cases despite appropriate antibiotic therapy, and patients with complicated tissue foci of infections are more likely to have poor outcomes [1, 2]. Risk stratification biomarkers offer a potential adjunctive tool for the identification of patients with S. aureus bacteremia at higher risk for poor outcomes, which could not only inform best management practices, but also facilitate clinical development of new drugs by identifying the patients who would most benefit from novel therapeutics [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daptomycin, the newest drug developed for S. aureus BS I, is over 13 years old and was approved based on noninferiority to older antibiotics, with MRSA clinical success rates of 44.4% for daptomycin and 31.8% for vancomycin (18). Subsequent attempts to develop new antibiotics for S. aureus bacteremia have failed (19,20). The addition of adjunctive agents such as immunotherapeutics (21)(22)(23)(24) or antibiotics (e.g., gentamicin, rifampin, or β-lactams; refs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Day 14 was selected as the primary efficacy endpoint because it was hypothesized that exebacase's novel, rapid mechanism of action and hallmark properties (9-12, 33) would lead to a more rapid resolution of clinical signs and symptoms of infection. The day 14 time point allowed for evaluation of the clinical rates in recent clinical trials of S. aureus bacteremia (18,20,27). This difference in mortality rates in cohort studies versus interventional trials reflects the intrinsic difference in the purpose of clinical medicine versus clinical trials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past several decades, there has been no significant improvement in morbidity or mortality in patients with complicated S. aureus infections (8,22,23). It is recognized that designing and executing clinical trials for S. aureus bacteremia is challenging (24). Daptomycin, approved in 2006, was the last antibiotic approved for the treatment of S. aureus bacteremia (8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%