Background: Primary care needs to be patient-centred, integrated and interprofessional to help patients with complex needs manage the burden of medication-related problems. Considering the growing problem of polypharmacy, there is increasing attention on how and when medicationrelated decisions should be coordinated across multi-disciplinary care teams. Improved knowledge on how integrated EHRs can support interprofessional shared decision-making for medication therapy management is necessary to continue to improve patient care.Objective: This objective of this study was to examine how physicians and pharmacists understand and communicate patient-focused medication information with each other and how this knowledge can influence the design of electronic health records.
Methods:This study is part of a broader cross-Canada study between patients and health care providers around how health-related decisions are made and communicated. We visited community pharmacies, team-based primary care clinics, and independent-practice family physician clinics throughout Ontario, Nova Scotia, Alberta, and Quebec. Research assistants conducted semi-structured interviews with physician and pharmacists. A modified version of the Multidisciplinary Framework Method was used to analyze the data.
Results:Data was collected at 19 pharmacies and 9 medical clinics and we identified six main themes from 34 health care professionals. First, Interprofessional Shared Decision Making was not occurring and clinicians made decision based on their understanding of the patient. Physicians and pharmacist reported indirect Communication, incomplete Information specifically missing insight into indication and adherence, and misaligned Processes of Care that were further compounded by electronic health records that are not designed to facilitate collaboration. Scope of Practice examined professional and workplace boundaries for pharmacists and physicians that were internally and externally imposed. Physicians decided on the degree of the Physician/Pharmacist Relationship which was often predicated by co-location.
Conclusion:When managing medications, there was limited communication and collaboration between primary care providers and pharmacists. Pharmacists were missing key information around reason for use, and physicians required accurate information around adherence. EHRs are a potential tool to help clinicians communicate information to resolve this issue. EHRs need to be designed to facilitate interprofessional medication management, so that pharmacists and physicians move beyond task-based work toward a collaborative approach. In the children's game of telephone, players sit in a circle and whisper a message from ear to ear until the message makes its way around the circle. In most cases, the original message is drastically different by the time it reaches the final player. In clinical settings, medication-related decisions are often passed verbally among patients, doctors, nurses and pharmacists, the message can be similarly distorted...