Considering equity in global health collaborations: A qualitative study on experiences of equity

Abstract

International collaborations have become the standard model for global health research and often include researchers and institutions from high income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). While such collaborations are important for generating new knowledge that will help address global health inequities, there is evidence to suggest that current forms of collaboration may reproduce unequal power relations. Therefore, we conducted a qualitative study with scientists, researchers and those involved in research management, working in international health collaborations. Interviews were conducted between October 2019 and March 2020. We conducted 13 interviews with 15 participants. From our findings, we derive three major themes. First, our results reflect characteristics of equitable, collaborative research relationships. Here we find both relational features, specifically trust and belonging, and structural features, including clear contractual agreements, capacity building, inclusive divisions of labour, and the involvement of local communities. Second, we discuss obstacles to develop equitable collaborations. These include exclusionary labour practices, donor-driven research agendas, overall research culture, lack of accountability and finally, the inadequate financing of indirect costs for LMIC institutions. Third, we discuss the responsibilities for promoting science equity of funders, LMIC researchers, LMIC institutions, and LMIC governments. While other empirical studies have suggested similar features of equity, our findings extend these features to include local communities as collaborators in research projects and not only as beneficiaries. We also suggest the importance of funders paying for indirect costs, without which the capacity of LMIC institutions will continually erode. And finally, our study shows the responsibilities of LMIC actors in developing equitable collaborations, which have largely been absent from the literature.

Decolonizing WASH Research: Results of a qualitative study and consensus-building process to develop principles for increasing equity in WASH Research

“…Power differentials encourage inequitable research partnerships, conflicting research priorities, and disparities in funding, authorship, and recognition. (Shumba & Lusambili, 2021; Faure, Munung, Ntusi, Pratt, & de Vries, 2021) The absence of LMIC representation within funding organizations and review committees perpetuates inequality within the sector. Furthermore, incompatibilities across different levels and systems within the research ecosystem result in substantial discrimination, but a lack of understanding or prioritization by powerful actors means such incompatibilities persist.…”

Research Partnerships and Guidance in Academic Global Ophthalmology

“…13 Measuring equity can occur through practices such as capacity building, assessing tasks within a team, data sharing, practices of dissemination of research, authorship, and funding transparency. 13 Effective team building and collaboration are paramount for implementing a study, but there are other practical considerations to conducting research. Funding needs to be secured and must be adequate to conduct all phases of the study including capacity building.…”

“… 13 Measuring equity can occur through practices such as capacity building, assessing tasks within a team, data sharing, practices of dissemination of research, authorship, and funding transparency. 13 …”

“…Another key ideal is creating equity among partnerships. This encompasses not only shared decision making, but also a framework that builds capacity, ensures development of local stakeholders, and takes into account inclusive decision making with viewpoints from all 13. Measuring equity can occur through practices such as capacity building, assessing tasks within a team, data sharing, practices of dissemination of research, authorship, and funding transparency 13…”

Academic Global Surgery: Creating Opportunities, Equity, and Diversity

“…Training is delivered by visiting faculty from the US, who teach and mentor surgeons year-round at Hawassa with the goal of increasing capacity to address the region's increasingly complex surgical care needs [7]. Bilateral partnerships increase awareness of each region's unique requirements through collaboration with frontline researchers, institutions, communities, and governments, while developing an international community of surgeons with the tools to address inequities in global surgery [13,14].…”