2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-022-01665-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considering Fish as Recipients of Ecosystem Services Provides a Framework to Formally Link Baseline, Development, and Post-operational Monitoring Programs and Improve Aquatic Impact Assessments for Large Scale Developments

Abstract: In most countries, major development projects must satisfy an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process that considers positive and negative aspects to determine if it meets environmental standards and appropriately mitigates or offsets negative impacts on the values being considered. The benefits of before-after-control-impact monitoring designs have been widely known for more than 30 years, but most development assessments fail to effectively link pre- and post-development monitoring in a meaningful way.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the scientific criticisms of EIA and the inability of many EIAs to have baseline data and predictive modeling support postdevelopment monitoring, considering the environment from the perspective of fish, or similarly valued biota, can help to guide science activities. Brown et al (2022) provides such a framework for consistency of indicators between the phases of an EIA. More must be expected from EIAs for proper evaluation and management of the environment to occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Given the scientific criticisms of EIA and the inability of many EIAs to have baseline data and predictive modeling support postdevelopment monitoring, considering the environment from the perspective of fish, or similarly valued biota, can help to guide science activities. Brown et al (2022) provides such a framework for consistency of indicators between the phases of an EIA. More must be expected from EIAs for proper evaluation and management of the environment to occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main science components of each EIA (i.e., baselines, predictions, monitoring) were assessed in the context of ES from a fish's perspective. What constitutes ES from a fish's perspective, and what should be assessed during the baseline, predictive, and monitoring phases of an EIA, are discussed in detail in Brown et al (2022) and only briefly summarized here. Different species of fish require various types and/or levels of food, dissolved oxygen (DO), thermal habitat, water flow, water quality, sediment, life stage habitat (i.e., spawning, nursery, migratory, and overwintering), and connectivity between these areas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It considers the chemical and physical characteristics of sediment that contribute to the health of aquatic ecosystems, including the quality of overlying waters and aquatic food chains. Advances have been made in the interpretation of the ecosystem services both provided and affected by sediments (Apitz, 2012), as well as environmental baseline values used to identify the nature and extent of environmental changes outside the range of natural variability (Brown et al, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%