Considering Sex as a Biological Variable in Basic and Clinical Studies: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement

Abstract

In May 2014, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) stated its intent to “require applicants to consider sex as a biological variable (SABV) in the design and analysis of NIH-funded research involving animals and cells.” Since then, proposed research plans that include animals routinely state that both sexes/genders will be used; however, in many instances, researchers and reviewers are at a loss about the issue of sex differences. Moreover, the terms sex and gender are used interchangeably by many researchers, further complicating the issue. In addition, the sex or gender of the researcher might influence study outcomes, especially those concerning behavioral studies, in both animals and humans. The act of observation may change the outcome (the “observer effect”) and any experimental manipulation, no matter how well-controlled, is subject to it. This is nowhere more applicable than in physiology and behavior. The sex of established cultured cell lines is another issue, in addition to aneuploidy; chromosomal numbers can change as cells are passaged. Additionally, culture medium contains steroids, growth hormone, and insulin that might influence expression of various genes. These issues often are not taken into account, determined, or even considered. Issues pertaining to the “sex” of cultured cells are beyond the scope of this Statement. However, we will discuss the factors that influence sex and gender in both basic research (that using animal models) and clinical research (that involving human subjects), as well as in some areas of science where sex differences are routinely studied. Sex differences in baseline physiology and associated mechanisms form the foundation for understanding sex differences in diseases pathology, treatments, and outcomes. The purpose of this Statement is to highlight lessons learned, caveats, and what to consider when evaluating data pertaining to sex differences, using 3 areas of research as examples; it is not intended to serve as a guideline for research design.

Physical Fitness Plays a Crucial Mediator Role in Relationships Among Personal, Social, and Lifestyle Factors With Adolescents' Cognitive Performance in a Structural Equation Model. The Cogni-Action Project

“…For instance, recommendations for futures studies should include diverse fitness components and cognitive tasks, explore cognitive outcomes rather than academic achievement, involve other socioeconomic status and geographical backgrounds, focus on sensible populations such as adolescents, and describe gender gaps to improve the quality and impact on this study area (17)(18)(19)(20)(21). Added to this, also it is relevant to contribute in this research area establishing analyses by sex (22) due to noticeable differences in pubertal hormones and brain plasticity which show great implications at a cognitive level during adolescence (23) at the physical activity level and academic achievement (24), vulnerability to poorer well-being and self-reported health (25), and other.…”

Cell Sex and Sex Hormones Modulate Kidney Glucose and Glutamine Metabolism in Health and Diabetes

“…Growing evidence demonstrates that the contribution of sex chromosomes in health and disease is broader than previously thought 86 . Genes escaping from the inactivation of one of the X chromosomes can be elevated in adult female tissues 65 , while Y chromosome genes are expressed by adult, somatic male tissues 87,88 . In the kidney, genes encoded by sex chromosomes can exhibit sex-biased expression and exert important functions [89][90][91] . In mammals, both sex chromosomes and sex hormones control tissue morphogenesis, organ size and metabolism, at different stages of life 92,93 .…”

Neuron-Glia-Immune Triad and Cortico-Limbic System in Pathology of Pain

“…Anatomical differences may explain sex differences in risk towards certain injuries and associated pain [ 70 ], although the mechanisms behind these sex differences are not known. Sex-specific differences in immune and stress responses [ 71 , 72 ] can be one explanation for differences in chronic pain conditions in men and women. Sex differences are reported in subsets of circulating T cell populations in men and women; higher CD4+ helper T cell counts and higher CD4:CD8 ratios are reported in women compared with men.…”