2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12187-018-9531-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considering the Natural Environment in the Creation of Child-Friendly Cities: Implications for Children’s Subjective Well-Being

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This cohort represents a much smaller proportion of the population and have historically been afforded access to opportunities and resources. This sub-set of the population typically resides in well-resourced communities characterised by low levels of crime, high employment, access to good municipal services and well-resourced schools (Adams et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cohort represents a much smaller proportion of the population and have historically been afforded access to opportunities and resources. This sub-set of the population typically resides in well-resourced communities characterised by low levels of crime, high employment, access to good municipal services and well-resourced schools (Adams et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Priorities should be given to the needs of children to develop parks, playgrounds, libraries, and museums that stimulate the creativity and mental abilities of children and enhance their physical development [40]. Child-friendly cities have both built and natural spaces [41][42][43] where children have the fundamental right to play, speak freely [44], and partake in meaningful activities [43] with other children and young people [44][45][46][47]. Children also have access to these natural spaces [36,48] and can independently explore their surrounding environment [49].…”
Section: Child-friendly Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relationship between children's activities and their surrounding neighborhood environment [97]; Methods, Tools and Instruments [98]; Risk perception [91]; Environmental friendliness of children's environment [94]; Children's and young people's perception [95]; Design and plan all public urban spaces keeping children in mind [99]; Meanings children attached to natural spaces and their mpact on their subjective well-being [41]; Natural Environment and Child-Friendly Cities [41] As this research target group is children aged 6 to 15 years, to obtain children's views directly, the 'Drawing' method was chosen [100][101][102].…”
Section: Techniques For Children's Participation In Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The planning and designing of child-friendly urban spaces hence operate within a paradoxical framework of limiting environmental risks, avoiding issues of liability whilst encouraging children and other underrepresented members of the community to actively contribute towards place-making and inclusion efforts (Loebach & Gilliland, 2019). This paradoxical framework is also reflected in the paucity of CFCs-related studies concerning children's perception of and interaction with their urban spaces in non-Western cities where direct threats of environmental degradation and extreme weather events are often part of the everyday reality (see Adams, et al, 2019;Cilliers & Cornelius, 2019;Ramezani & Said, 2013)…”
Section: To Design or Not Designmentioning
confidence: 99%