2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-015-1248-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considering the potential effect of faulting on regional-scale groundwater flow: an illustrative example from Australia’s Great Artesian Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In his book about flow systems, Tóth (2009) states that since the 1960s, hydrogeology's basic paradigm has shifted from confined flow in aquifers (aquitard-bound flow) to cross-formational flow in drainage basins, i.e., flow paths change from through a confined aquifer to across aquitards and different depths of aquifers in heterogeneous basins. Although cross-formational flow (inter-aquifer leakage) had already been anticipated by Chamberlin (1885), it was identified in the Dakota artesian basin through aquitards in the 1960s (Swenson, 1968), and it was recently identified in the Great Artesian Basin through faults (Pandey et al, 2020;Smerdon and Turnadge, 2015). Moreover, although the concept of flowing wells in the context of aquitard bounding is introduced in almost every groundwater textbook, the concept of unconfined-flow flowing wells in homogeneous basins has been included in few textbooks (Domenico and Schwartz, 1998;Freeze and Cherry, 1979;Heath, 1983;Kasenow, 2010;Lohman, 1972b).…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Of Topographically Driven Groundwater mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In his book about flow systems, Tóth (2009) states that since the 1960s, hydrogeology's basic paradigm has shifted from confined flow in aquifers (aquitard-bound flow) to cross-formational flow in drainage basins, i.e., flow paths change from through a confined aquifer to across aquitards and different depths of aquifers in heterogeneous basins. Although cross-formational flow (inter-aquifer leakage) had already been anticipated by Chamberlin (1885), it was identified in the Dakota artesian basin through aquitards in the 1960s (Swenson, 1968), and it was recently identified in the Great Artesian Basin through faults (Pandey et al, 2020;Smerdon and Turnadge, 2015). Moreover, although the concept of flowing wells in the context of aquitard bounding is introduced in almost every groundwater textbook, the concept of unconfined-flow flowing wells in homogeneous basins has been included in few textbooks (Domenico and Schwartz, 1998;Freeze and Cherry, 1979;Heath, 1983;Kasenow, 2010;Lohman, 1972b).…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Of Topographically Driven Groundwater mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Groundwater compartmentalisation is important for determining the potential migration routes and receptors of fracking fluid contaminants because it can create groundwater flow directions different to regional trends. 22,23 Where basins and groundwater flow extend across multiple jurisdictions this could be important because each jurisdiction may have different groundwater management legislation. 23 Compartmentalisation is also important because it can discourage lateral groundwater flow and encourage upward flow in the presence of a vertical head gradient.…”
Section: Implications For Frackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,23 Where basins and groundwater flow extend across multiple jurisdictions this could be important because each jurisdiction may have different groundwater management legislation. 23 Compartmentalisation is also important because it can discourage lateral groundwater flow and encourage upward flow in the presence of a vertical head gradient. 14 A compartmentalised basin may therefore create compartments with higher vulnerabilities to contamination because regional lateral groundwater flow cannot dilute any fracking fluid contaminants.…”
Section: Implications For Frackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations