2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.03.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistency in inspection processes of food control officials and efficacy of official controls in restaurants in Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Läikkö‐Roto et al () reinforce still that changes of paradigm in the sense of finding the majority of foodservices in adequate hygienic and sanitary conditions will only be possible when the responsible for foodservices, legislation authorities, and the community take appropriation of the current legislations and of their obligations to society, as well as recognize their responsibilities to meet this important role.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Läikkö‐Roto et al () reinforce still that changes of paradigm in the sense of finding the majority of foodservices in adequate hygienic and sanitary conditions will only be possible when the responsible for foodservices, legislation authorities, and the community take appropriation of the current legislations and of their obligations to society, as well as recognize their responsibilities to meet this important role.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Devides, Maffei, and Catanozi (2014), when questioned why they sought training courses in good handling practices, the participants reported that it was because of the requirements of the sanitary inspection agency, which indicates the importance of the actions of these agencies, whose main purpose is to guide, monitor, and licensing the establishments to handling, produce, market, distribute, and/or store food (Harris, Dipietro, Murphy, & Rivera, 2014;Läikkö-Roto, Makela, Lundén, Heikkila, & Nevas, 2015).…”
Section: % Adequacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the enforcement processes can sometimes be lengthy, compliance has been reported for the majority of violations indicative of their utility for prolonged non-compliances 45 . Recurrence may also reflect more the difficulty FPPs experience with non-compliances than imply inefficacy of time limits or demands, as time limits have previously been associated with successful correction and smaller occurrence of violations 40,46 . Long enough time periods may be important for correction 40 , and thereby, time limits should consider both the FPP resources and the severity of the non-compliance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recurrence may also reflect more the difficulty FPPs experience with non-compliances than imply inefficacy of time limits or demands, as time limits have previously been associated with successful correction and smaller occurrence of violations 40,46 . Long enough time periods may be important for correction 40 , and thereby, time limits should consider both the FPP resources and the severity of the non-compliance. Ideally, re-inspection should be carried out within the time limit to ensure its efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These difficulties were identified during sanitary inspections carried out by authorities to evaluate compliance with conditions established by current laws and to guide foodservices about needed improvements (Laikko-Rotto, Makela, Lund en, Heikkila, & Nevas, 2015). Through observation of important factors related to sanitary risk, measures should be prioritized so that the safety of prepared food is not compromised, thus protecting public health (Alsallaiy et al, 2016;Gonçalves et al, 2013;Lee et al, 2014;Powell et al, 2013).…”
Section: Implementation Of Good Handling Practices In Foodservices Ismentioning
confidence: 99%