2019
DOI: 10.3150/18-bej1050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistency of Bayesian nonparametric inference for discretely observed jump diffusions

Abstract: We introduce verifiable criteria for weak posterior consistency of Bayesian nonparametric inference for jump diffusions with unit diffusion coefficient and uniformly Lipschitz drift and jump coefficients in arbitrary dimension. The criteria are expressed in terms of coefficients of the SDEs describing the process, and do not depend on intractable quantities such as transition densities. We also show that priors built from discrete nets, wavelet expansions, and Dirichlet mixture models satisfy our conditions. T… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lemma 1 of [Koskela et al, 2017] yields that the topology generated by U φ f,ε is Hausdorff, and hence separates points.…”
Section: By Fubini's Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lemma 1 of [Koskela et al, 2017] yields that the topology generated by U φ f,ε is Hausdorff, and hence separates points.…”
Section: By Fubini's Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…one which does not assign full mass to the truth), including parametric families. In Theorem 2 we adapt a result of [Koskela et al, 2017] to provide verifiable criteria on the prior for posterior consistency when time series data is available. We also show in Section 5 that the popular Dirichlet process mixture model prior [Lo, 1984] satisfies these conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where L 2 is the usual space of square integrable functions with respect to Lebesgue measure. Occasionally it will be convenient to replace the L 2 -inner product above by the L 2 (µ)-inner product, where µ is the invariant measure of (X t : t ≥ 0), which by (24) induces a norm which is equivalent to the norm induced by (16). We will also use the fractional Sobolev spaces H s for real s ≥ 0, which are obtained by interpolation, see [17].…”
Section: S Wangmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other sampling schemes, various methods have been studied, see e.g. [15] for a frequentist approach, [13,16,28,1,22] for recent posterior consistency and contraction rate results for Bayesian methods as well as [25,26] for MCMC methodology for the computation of the Bayesian posterior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While such Bayesian methods are attractive in applications [15], [27], [35], particularly since they provide associated uncertainty quantification procedures ('credible regions'), our understanding of their frequentist sampling performance is extremely limited. This is particularly so in the 'low frequency' regime when ∆ > 0 is thought to be fixed: the only references we are aware of are the consistency results in [31], [16], [18], which only hold under the very restrictive assumption that σ is constant and known, and only in a weak topology. As pointed out by Stuart [27] and van Zanten [35], obtaining theoretical performance guarantees for Bayesian algorithms in nonlinear inverse problems is, however, of key importance if such methods are to be used in scientific applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%