2019
DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.44.31650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistency of impact assessment protocols for non-native species

Abstract: Standardized tools are needed to identify and prioritize the most harmful non-native species (NNS). A plethora of assessment protocols have been developed to evaluate the current and potential impacts of non-native species, but consistency among them has received limited attention. To estimate the consistency across impact assessment protocols, 89 specialists in biological invasions used 11 protocols to screen 57 NNS (2614 assessments). We tested if the consistency in the impact scoring across assessors, quant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, our evidence-mapping scheme needs to be used in tandem with recent recommendations aimed at reducing disagreement between expert assessors (e.g. Turbé et al 2017, Vanderhoeven et al 2017González-Moreno et al 2019), to obtain more comprehensive impact assessments. Altogether, we argue that mapping all of the available evidence allows all the above-mentioned issues to be transparently considered during the decision-making phase of risk management.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Impact Evidence-mapping Scheme and "Wiki-review"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, our evidence-mapping scheme needs to be used in tandem with recent recommendations aimed at reducing disagreement between expert assessors (e.g. Turbé et al 2017, Vanderhoeven et al 2017González-Moreno et al 2019), to obtain more comprehensive impact assessments. Altogether, we argue that mapping all of the available evidence allows all the above-mentioned issues to be transparently considered during the decision-making phase of risk management.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Impact Evidence-mapping Scheme and "Wiki-review"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combined methodology of mitochondrial COI sequencing, microsatellite genotyping and morphological analysis has the potential to pick apart the exact identification of genetically complex species groups for which traditional ecological methods may have overlooked complex relationships such as in Corbicula [27] with its highly invasive clonal A/R form. The ability to discriminate between discreet introductions to a geographic area, and secondary spread is an invaluable tool in prioritising AIS biosecurity resources [45] and can inform horizon scanning [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to González-Moreno et al (2019), to identify the most harmful NIS on a larger trans-regional scale, standardized tools are needed, as well as highly skilled experts, to whom adequate training and clear guidelines have been given. In parallel, the mapping and quantification of NIS impacts on a Mediterranean scale, combined with better knowledge about the anthropogenic pressures that have led to the majority of the invasions, would significantly help scientists and policy makers in the preparation of prevention or mitigation actions.…”
Section: Toward the Establishment Of Mitigation Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%