2009
DOI: 10.1002/num.20422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistency of iterative operator‐splitting methods: Theory and applications

Abstract: In this article, we describe a different operator-splitting method for decoupling complex equations with multidimensional and multiphysical processes for applications for porous media and phase-transitions. We introduce different operator-splitting methods with respect to their usability and applicability in computer codes. The error-analysis for the iterative operator-splitting methods is discussed. Numerical examples are presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[20] Although seldom recognized, this sequential flux treatment constitutes an "operator-splitting" (OS) approach, a numerical method popular for partial differential equations (PDEs) describing multiple spatially distributed processes with widely different time scales and behavior (e.g., see Geiser [2010] for general theory, Steefel and MacQuarrie [1996] for common geochemical applications, and Kavetski et al [2003] and Schoups et al [2010] for a discussion in rainfall-runoff modeling contexts). At the expense of additional "splitting" error, OS strategies allow the application of specialized numerical approximations to each individual process.…”
Section: Formulation Of Governing Model Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20] Although seldom recognized, this sequential flux treatment constitutes an "operator-splitting" (OS) approach, a numerical method popular for partial differential equations (PDEs) describing multiple spatially distributed processes with widely different time scales and behavior (e.g., see Geiser [2010] for general theory, Steefel and MacQuarrie [1996] for common geochemical applications, and Kavetski et al [2003] and Schoups et al [2010] for a discussion in rainfall-runoff modeling contexts). At the expense of additional "splitting" error, OS strategies allow the application of specialized numerical approximations to each individual process.…”
Section: Formulation Of Governing Model Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For i = 3, we have: Here an optimization is possible by assuming that commutators are equal or at least zero, see [2] and [8].…”
Section: Computation Of the Iterative Splitting Method: Closed Formulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, they can be used to accelerate the iterative process of solving partial differential equations, see [21]. In the next step, the generalization of iterative splitting schemes to unbounded operators allows them be applied to partial differential equations, see [8], [9]. In this paper, we deal with a general scheme, a so called multi-stage scheme, which gives a significant improvement in terms of accuracy, numerical stability and reduction of local and global errors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intermediate time‐level is given by t 0 = 0,…, t N = T . We obtain a Cauchy initial value problem, see [27].…”
Section: Analytical Solutions and Mass Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we could also embed semianalytical solutions of coupled convection–reaction problems that arise out of mobile and immobile models. Such coupling is done with iterative splitting methods, which combine the analytical parts of each equation with successive iterations, see [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%