1997
DOI: 10.1176/ajp.154.2.173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistency of memory for combat-related traumatic events in veterans of Operation Desert Storm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
86
2
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 324 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
86
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The validity and reliability of a number of self-reported military-related factors have been evaluated by several studies, usually in comparison to data from the U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Manpower Data Center, and been characterized as ranging from “moderate” (e.g., κ = 0.41–0.60) to “almost perfect” (e.g., κ > 0.80) (Bramsen et al, 2001; Horner et al, 2003; Janes et al, 1991; LeardMann et al, 2007; Mahan, 2004; Roemer et al, 1998; Smith et al, 2007a; Smith et al, 2007b; Smith et al, 2007c; Southwick et al, 1997). Military-related factors evaluated in validity studies included deployment status and frequency, number, and start dates of deployment(s) (Horner et al, 2003; Smith et al, 2007b); occupational titles (Smith et al, 2007c); and anthrax (LeardMann et al, 2007; Smith et al, 2007a) or smallpox vaccination (Mahan, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The validity and reliability of a number of self-reported military-related factors have been evaluated by several studies, usually in comparison to data from the U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Manpower Data Center, and been characterized as ranging from “moderate” (e.g., κ = 0.41–0.60) to “almost perfect” (e.g., κ > 0.80) (Bramsen et al, 2001; Horner et al, 2003; Janes et al, 1991; LeardMann et al, 2007; Mahan, 2004; Roemer et al, 1998; Smith et al, 2007a; Smith et al, 2007b; Smith et al, 2007c; Southwick et al, 1997). Military-related factors evaluated in validity studies included deployment status and frequency, number, and start dates of deployment(s) (Horner et al, 2003; Smith et al, 2007b); occupational titles (Smith et al, 2007c); and anthrax (LeardMann et al, 2007; Smith et al, 2007a) or smallpox vaccination (Mahan, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Military-related factors evaluated in validity studies included deployment status and frequency, number, and start dates of deployment(s) (Horner et al, 2003; Smith et al, 2007b); occupational titles (Smith et al, 2007c); and anthrax (LeardMann et al, 2007; Smith et al, 2007a) or smallpox vaccination (Mahan, 2004). Reliability studies evaluated combat-related experiences, exposures, or traumatic events (Bramsen et al, 2001; Janes et al, 1991; Roemer et al, 1998; Southwick et al, 1997) and exposure indices created by summing or averaging participants’ responses for individual items (Bramsen et al, 2001; Janes et al, 1991; Roemer et al, 1998; Southwick et al, 1997). None of these studies, however, were able to assess the validity or reliability of self-reported military-related factors extending back to WWII (the longest time between exposure and exposure assessment in these studies was about 10 years (Horner et al, 2003)) or whether the quality of self-report varied by war or time period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, however, given that current symptomatology may bias recall of early life stressors (e.g. Southwick et al 1997), prospective longitudinal, rather than retrospective studies would be needed to more conclusively establish the link between early life stress and structural brain abnormalities, ideally complementing self-report measures of stressors with more ‘objective’ measures (e.g. assessments of stress hormones).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[91-93] We have addressed this recall biases critique in our longitudinal study of Bosnian refugees using measurements that were also applied in this study [94] and suspect that there was an underreporting of all events over-time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%