Consistency of the spatial autocorrelation method with seismic interferometry and its consequence

Abstract

A B S T R A C TWe have cross-checked the conventional theory of the spatial autocorrelation method and the consequence of seismic interferometry: the retrieval of the elastodynamic Green's function. Their mutual consistency is almost complete. The basic formulas of the conventional spatial autocorrelation theory can be derived by an alternative approach based on the retrieval of the elastodynamic Green's function. The only discrepancy is found with the average of the complex coherence function over azimuth in a wavefield dependent on azimuth. It is hypothesized, in discussion, that this discrepancy is due to the way of representing the wavefield in the background theory of seismic interferometry that can produce only wavefields moderately dependent on azimuth and that the mentioned consequence of seismic interferometry can also only make sense in a wavefield moderately dependent on azimuth.Our field experiment with a wavefield dependent on azimuth showed that the consequence of seismic interferometry in the logical framework of the conventional spatial autocorrelation theory is appropriate under such degrees of approximation as the measure proposed in this study, i.e., the deviation of the total dispersion curves is between about 10 and 16 per cent at the maximum from those averaged over azimuth.The acceptance of the retrieval of Green's function gives a proper physical meaning to the complex coherence function: the real part of the elastodynamic Green's function normalized by its zero-offset version. This makes it possible to take a deterministic approach rather than the statistical one on which the conventional spatial autocorrelation method is based and gives fruitful new aspects and perspectives. For example, the formula for the multi-mode case is given and the possibility of exploration of two or three dimensional velocity structures is suggested. I N T R O D U C T I O NExploration of the shear-wave velocity at the shallowest part of sediment is a key issue of engineering seismology and earthquake engineering. As these low-velocity layers amplify the seismic waves considerably and vary site by site abruptly, it is necessary to explore the underground velocity structure at each site. A commercial market was then formed for geotechnical geophysics directly related to civil engineering. This laterally varying amplification takes place not only for seismic * E-mail: tyokoi@kenken.go.jp waves due to tectonic earthquakes but also for the elastic waves produced by a surface shot and reflected by the velocity discontinuities that can be significant for production. If one wishes to extract useful information from the lateral variation of the reflected shear waves' amplitude, the effects of the shallowest sedimentary layers have to be taken into account, namely, they have to be quantitatively estimated and corrected. Among the various useful methods to estimate the underground shear-wave velocity structure, the usage of microtremor (ambient noise) is preferred by engineering seismologists because it does not require a...

Shear wave velocity versus quality factor: results from seismic noise recordings

“…Yokoi & Margaryan 2008;Tsai & Moschetti 2010), it is likely that we mainly capture the intrinsic mechanism of energy loss of the direct surface waves which is likely to dominate over scattering, in agreement with large-scale crustal studies by Del Pezzo et al (1995) and Tselentis (1998). The fact that the intrinsic attenuation is likely to dominate at higher frequencies in all the cases, is also in line with the results of the detrended fluctuation analysis (cf.…”

Application of seismic interferometry by multidimensional deconvolution to ambient seismic noise recorded in Malargüe, Argentina

“…This proportionality of the crosscorrelation to a zeroth-order Bessel function has previously been recognized (e.g. Aki 1957;Yokoi & Margaryan 2008) and has been used to estimate both surface wave phase velocity (e.g. Ekström et al 2009) and surface wave attenuation (Prieto et al 2009;Weemstra et al 2013).…”

Seismic attenuation from recordings of ambient noise

“…Larose et al, 2006;Wapenaar et al, 2010), or by multiple scattering among heterogeneities in a complex medium (Campillo and Paul, 2003). The relation between the SPAC applied to a seismic wavefield (Aki,1957)ononehandandtimedomain cross correlation of ambient seismic noise on the other hand, pointed out by Yokoi and Margaryan (2008) and shown explicitly by Tsai and Moschetti (2010), is the backbone of the method applied here because it justifies azimuthal averaging of crosscorrelations in an o n -i s o t r o p i cs e i s m i cw a v e fi e l d .…”