1998
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.940655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation in Probit Models with Autocorrelated Errors

Abstract: Some recent time-series applications use probit models to measure the forecasting power of a set of variables. Correct inferences about the significance of the variables requires a consistent estimator of the covariance matrix of the estimated model coefficients. A potential source of inconsistency in maximum likelihood standard errors is serial correlation in the underlying disturbances, which may arise, for example, from overlapping forecasts. We discuss several practical methods for constructing probit auto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the use of overlapping forecast horizon in the multiperiod forecasting or an incorrect model specification indicates that the standard errors based on the asymptotic distribution (10) become inconsistent (Estrella and Rodrigues, 1998). The asymptotic distribution of the maximum likelihood estimate in the case of a misspecified model is…”
Section: Dynamic Probit Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the use of overlapping forecast horizon in the multiperiod forecasting or an incorrect model specification indicates that the standard errors based on the asymptotic distribution (10) become inconsistent (Estrella and Rodrigues, 1998). The asymptotic distribution of the maximum likelihood estimate in the case of a misspecified model is…”
Section: Dynamic Probit Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the DCI, there is no such forecast period because of its expected function of coincidence. For the DLI, standard errors are corrected for autocorrelations in errors arising from overlapping of forecast periods, using the method of Estrella and Rodrigues (1998). The results indicate that the DLI and the DCI are significant at the conventional level in all cases.…”
Section: Empirical Results: the DLI And The Dcimentioning
confidence: 97%
“…6(4), [100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109]2017 Under the assumption that the EPU indexes increase by one standard deviation at h = 0, Figure 2 plots the estimated marginal effects of the EPU indexes on the recession probability, along with the 95% confidence bands, from h = 1 to h = 60. The robust standard errors developed by Estrella and Rodrigues (1998) are used to compute the confidence bands. The marginal effects of the overall EPU index are positive and statistically significant from h = 1 to h = 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many fit measures have been proposed for probit and other binary choice models. In this paper, we use the so-called pseudo 2 developed by and Estrella and Rodrigues (1998):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%